2016 · Week 11

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

16·22

Giants

New York

QB Eli Manning

MetLife Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 41°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

NYG -7

Total

41.5

Model margin

+5.9est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

5.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapGiants
  • -0.042EPA / play-0.074
  • 44.1%Success rate40.8%
  • -0.001EPA / dropback-0.035
  • -0.111EPA / rush-0.142
  • 10.0%Explosive rate7.3%
  • -0.10CPOE-1.63
  • 37.8%Third-down rate36.0%
  • 52.5%Red-zone TD rate61.2%
  • 1.41Points / drive1.46
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CHI lead 7–6 since 1999

Meetings average 38.4 points. NYG are 9-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10NYG @ CHI2024CHI
2022 · W4CHI @ NYG1220NYG
2021 · W17NYG @ CHI329CHI
2020 · W2NYG @ CHI1317CHI
2019 · W12NYG @ CHI1419CHI
2018 · W13CHI @ NYG2730NYG
2013 · W6NYG @ CHI2127CHI
2010 · W4CHI @ NYG317NYG

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler17/3025211

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jordan Howard17774.50
Jeremy Langford681.31
Jay Cutler133.00

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Eli Manning21/3622720

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rashad Jennings21854.01
Paul Perkins4164.00
Eli Manning410.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.3%6.2%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

4.97%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

64.7%

Expected total

44.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.40
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.85
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+5.91