2016 · Week 17 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Matt Barkley

10·38

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Sam Bradford

U.S. Bank Stadium · dome · sportturf

Closing spread

MIN -6

Total

44

Model margin

+3.9est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.042EPA / play-0.042
  • 44.1%Success rate42.5%
  • -0.001EPA / dropback+0.075
  • -0.111EPA / rush-0.253
  • 10.0%Explosive rate7.1%
  • -0.10CPOE+3.80
  • 37.8%Third-down rate38.4%
  • 52.5%Red-zone TD rate49.1%
  • 1.41Points / drive1.65
  • 2.9%Turnover rate1.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Barkley10/1412502
David Fales2/52200
Cameron Meredith1/1210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jordan Howard231355.90
Jeremy Langford10262.60
Josh Bellamy2189.00
Bralon Addison144.00
David Fales100.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Sam Bradford25/3325031
Shaun Hill0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jerick McKinnon16895.61
Sam Bradford12424.00
Matt Asiata8141.80
Shaun Hill3-3-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.5%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.16
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.90