2017 · Week 2

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB Jay Cutler

19·17

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Philip Rivers

StubHub Center · outdoors · grass · 71°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

LAC -3.5

Total

46.5

Model margin

+5.5est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapChargers
  • -0.125EPA / play+0.085
  • 39.2%Success rate44.9%
  • -0.086EPA / dropback+0.191
  • -0.198EPA / rush-0.082
  • 7.0%Explosive rate10.3%
  • -0.06CPOE+0.86
  • 31.0%Third-down rate40.7%
  • 57.1%Red-zone TD rate66.7%
  • 1.31Points / drive1.87
  • 2.7%Turnover rate1.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIA lead 12–6 since 1999

Meetings average 40.4 points. LAC are 6-12 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6LAC @ MIA2927CHARGERS
2023 · W1MIA @ LAC3634MIA
2022 · W14MIA @ LAC1723CHARGERS
2020 · W10LAC @ MIA2129MIA
2019 · W4LAC @ MIA3010CHARGERS
2016 · W10MIA @ SD3124MIA
2015 · W15MIA @ SD1430CHARGERS
2014 · W9SD @ MIA037MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler24/3323010
Jarvis Landry0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jay Ajayi281224.40
Jay Cutler2-1-0.50
Kenyan Drake1-3-3.00
Jarvis Landry1-7-7.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
DeVante Parker49850
Jarvis Landry1315780
Kenny Stills25371
Julius Thomas33260
Jay Ajayi2240

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Philip Rivers31/3933110

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Branden Oliver33110.30
Melvin Gordon9131.41
Philip Rivers100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +3.53.4%6.3%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

2.54%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

63.5%

Expected total

45.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.36
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.64
  • Expected margin+5.46