2023 · Week 1

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB Tua Tagovailoa

36·34

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome

Closing spread

LAC -3

Total

50.5

Model margin

-0.6est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

7.3%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapChargers
  • +0.095EPA / play-0.070
  • 47.3%Success rate41.4%
  • +0.167EPA / dropback+0.018
  • -0.009EPA / rush-0.242
  • 11.5%Explosive rate6.9%
  • +4.40CPOE-1.84
  • 42.5%Third-down rate38.3%
  • 70.6%Red-zone TD rate54.8%
  • 2.34Points / drive1.75
  • 2.3%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIA lead 12–6 since 1999

Meetings average 40.4 points. LAC are 6-12 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6LAC @ MIA2927CHARGERS
2022 · W14MIA @ LAC1723CHARGERS
2020 · W10LAC @ MIA2129MIA
2019 · W4LAC @ MIA3010CHARGERS
2017 · W2MIA @ LAC1917MIA
2016 · W10MIA @ SD3124MIA
2015 · W15MIA @ SD1430CHARGERS
2014 · W9SD @ MIA037MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tua Tagovailoa28/4546631

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Raheem Mostert10373.71
Erik Ezukanma2178.50
Salvon Ahmed3113.70
Tua Tagovailoa551.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Tyreek Hill11152152
Jaylen Waddle45780
Durham Smythe37440
Braxton Berrios35420
River Cracraft35401
Raheem Mostert22130
Salvon Ahmed0300

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert23/3322910

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler161177.31
Joshua Kelley16915.71
Justin Herbert5173.41
Keenan Allen263.00
Gerald Everett122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

7.28%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

47.4%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.32
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.62