2017 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

31·7

Browns

Cleveland

QB DeShone Kizer

FirstEnergy Stadium · outdoors · grass · 63°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

CIN -3

Total

41.5

Model margin

-0.1est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

7.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapBrowns
  • -0.088EPA / play-0.146
  • 39.2%Success rate38.4%
  • -0.050EPA / dropback-0.169
  • -0.150EPA / rush-0.096
  • 7.8%Explosive rate8.9%
  • -1.89CPOE-5.42
  • 34.7%Third-down rate33.6%
  • 66.6%Red-zone TD rate50.5%
  • 1.49Points / drive1.07
  • 2.2%Turnover rate3.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CIN lead 32–22 since 1999

Meetings average 42.7 points. CLE are 24-29-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18CLE @ CIN2018CLE
2025 · W1CIN @ CLE1716CIN
2024 · W16CLE @ CIN624CIN
2024 · W7CIN @ CLE2114CIN
2023 · W18CLE @ CIN1431CIN
2023 · W1CIN @ CLE324CLE
2022 · W14CLE @ CIN1023CIN
2022 · W8CIN @ CLE1332CLE

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton25/3028640

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Andy Dalton4297.30
Joe Mixon17291.70
Jeremy Hill6162.70
Giovani Bernard3124.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Tyler Kroft67682
Giovani Bernard34671
A.J. Green57631
Joe Mixon44190
Brandon LaFell23170
Ryan Hewitt11160
Tyler Boyd22150
C.J. Uzomah11110
Jeremy Hill11100

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
DeShone Kizer16/3411801
Kevin Hogan5/86500

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Isaiah Crowell7202.90
Duke Johnson4133.31
DeShone Kizer5102.00
Matt Dayes122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -32.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

7.36%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.9%

Expected total

43.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.79
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.05