2017 · Week 7 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

0·33

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

Twickenham Stadium · outdoors · grass · 54°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

LA -3

Total

45.5

Model margin

+1.7est.

LA perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapRams
  • -0.129EPA / play+0.054
  • 38.8%Success rate43.3%
  • -0.086EPA / dropback+0.131
  • -0.207EPA / rush-0.050
  • 7.2%Explosive rate11.4%
  • -4.25CPOE-1.32
  • 35.7%Third-down rate41.3%
  • 52.2%Red-zone TD rate56.1%
  • 1.20Points / drive2.27
  • 2.3%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–20 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43 points. LA are 25-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18ARI @ LA2037RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI4517RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA913RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI1041ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI3714RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA926RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA2717ARI
2022 · W3LA @ ARI2012RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer10/1812201
Drew Stanton5/146601

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson11211.90
Drew Stanton144.00

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff22/3723511

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley221064.81
Malcolm Brown11484.40
Tavon Austin3279.00
Jared Goff2136.51
Robert Woods144.00
Sean Mannion1-1-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Robert Woods57590
Cooper Kupp410511
Todd Gurley48480
Sammy Watkins35420
Tavon Austin22150
Tyler Higbee33130
Malcolm Brown1170
Derek Carrier0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.1%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

7.49%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.5%

Expected total

41.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.08
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.66