Closing spread
SF -6.5
Total
44.5
Model margin
-10.8est.
LA perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
49ers
- LimitedAdrian ColbertSShoulder
- LimitedGarrett CelekTEKnee
- LimitedMarquise GoodwinWRBack
- LimitedTrent TaylorWRShoulder
Rams
- DoubtfulMark BarronLBAchilles· DNP
- QuestionableCooper KuppWRKnee· Limited
- DNPMatt LongacreLBBack
- LimitedAndrew WhitworthTNot Injury Related
- LimitedJohn SullivanCNot Injury Related
- LimitedRodger SaffoldGOblique
Win probability
- Rams
- 49ers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.041EPA / play+0.054
- 41.2%Success rate43.3%
- -0.001EPA / dropback+0.131
- -0.110EPA / rush-0.050
- 9.2%Explosive rate11.4%
- -3.27CPOE-1.32
- 39.5%Third-down rate41.3%
- 45.0%Red-zone TD rate56.1%
- 1.75Points / drive2.27
- 2.0%Turnover rate1.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SF lead 31–24–1 since 1999
Meetings average 43.4 points. LA are 23-31-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SF–LA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 60 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| LA | Q1 12:08 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 3–0 |
| SF | Q1 9:41 | 8 | 82 | Touchdown | 10–0 |
| LA | Q1 5:14 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 10–0 |
| SF | Q1 4:14 | 2 | 14 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| LA | Q1 3:24 | 6 | 9 | Field goal | 10–3 |
| SF | Q1 1:11 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 10–3 |
| LA | Q2 14:43 | 9 | 18 | Punt | 10–3 |
| SF | Q2 9:52 | 10 | 67 | Field goal | 13–3 |
| LA | Q2 5:00 | 5 | -1 | Punt | 13–3 |
| SF | Q2 2:13 | 4 | 49 | Touchdown | 20–3 |
| LA | Q2 1:13 | 7 | 44 | Turnover | 20–3 |
| SF | Q2 0:16 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 20–3 |
| LA | Q2 0:09 | 1 | 50 | Field goal | 20–6 |
| LA | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 20–6 |
| SF | Q3 13:31 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 20–6 |
| LA | Q3 10:53 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 20–6 |
| SF | Q3 8:45 | 7 | 60 | Touchdown | 27–6 |
| LA | Q3 6:12 | 7 | 41 | Turnover | 27–6 |
| SF | Q3 3:33 | 7 | 53 | Touchdown | 34–6 |
| LA | Q4 14:54 | 15 | 67 | Touchdown | 34–13 |
| SF | Q4 6:40 | 7 | 51 | Turnover | 34–13 |
| LA | Q4 3:48 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 34–13 |
| SF | Q4 1:51 | 1 | 6 | End of half | 34–13 |
Box score
Individual performances
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Garoppolo | 20/33 | 292 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Hyde | 15 | 88 | 5.9 | 2 |
| Matt Breida | 12 | 72 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Jimmy Garoppolo | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Kittle | 4 | 6 | 100 | 0 |
| Matt Breida | 1 | 2 | 32 | 0 |
| Trent Taylor | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 |
| Garrett Celek | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 2 | 4 | 28 | 1 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 2 | 5 | 28 | 0 |
| Aldrick Robinson | 1 | 3 | 12 | 1 |
| Carlos Hyde | 2 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Louis Murphy | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Rams
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean Mannion | 20/34 | 169 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malcolm Brown | 14 | 54 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Tavon Austin | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Lance Dunbar | 6 | 20 | 3.3 | 1 |
| Sean Mannion | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Thomas | 3 | 4 | 75 | 0 |
| Pharoh Cooper | 2 | 4 | 30 | 0 |
| Gerald Everett | 3 | 6 | 16 | 0 |
| Josh Reynolds | 2 | 6 | 16 | 0 |
| Tavon Austin | 3 | 5 | 14 | 0 |
| Derek Carrier | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| Malcolm Brown | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Lance Dunbar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour 49ers.
Half-point at risk
3.04%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
22.5%
Expected total
43.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.26
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment-12.78
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-10.77



