Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2018 · Week 2 · Division

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Joe Flacco

23·34

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 82°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

CIN -1

Total

43

Model margin

-1.0est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapBengals
  • +0.035EPA / play+0.013
  • 45.8%Success rate43.6%
  • +0.061EPA / dropback+0.074
  • +0.003EPA / rush-0.105
  • 8.8%Explosive rate10.1%
  • -3.77CPOE-3.54
  • 45.4%Third-down rate36.9%
  • 57.5%Red-zone TD rate72.1%
  • 2.01Points / drive1.95
  • 1.6%Turnover rate1.6%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. CIN are 28-25-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Joe Flacco32/5537622

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alex Collins9353.90
Joe Flacco382.70
Javorius Allen681.31
Maxx Williams177.00
Lamar Jackson263.00
Chris Moore122.00

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton24/4226540

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Joe Mixon21844.00
Giovani Bernard6274.50
John Ross1-3-3.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Tyler Boyd69911
A.J. Green59693
C.J. Uzomah34450
Tyler Eifert24230
Giovani Bernard47150
Tyler Kroft22110
John Ross1480
Joe Mixon1130
Josh Malone0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +12.8%4.5%3.0%7.4%7.2%2.8%4.3%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.14%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

46.5%

Expected total

46.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.70
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-0.96