Closing spread
CLE -10
Total
44
Model margin
+5.5est.
CLE perspective
Push chance
3.3%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bengals
- OutJordan EvansLBAnkle· DNP
- OutTony McRaeCBHamstring· DNP
- OutTyler BoydWRKnee· DNP
- QuestionableVontaze BurfictLBConcussion· Full
- DNPMalik JeffersonLBToe
Browns
- QuestionableAustin CorbettTFoot· Limited
- QuestionableJ.C. TretterCAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableJabrill PeppersSNeck· Limited
- QuestionableLarry OgunjobiDTBiceps· Limited
- QuestionablePhillip GainesCBKnee· Full
- QuestionableTanner VallejoLBHamstring· Full
Win probability
- Browns
- Bengals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.013EPA / play-0.009
- 43.6%Success rate42.8%
- +0.074EPA / dropback+0.037
- -0.105EPA / rush-0.091
- 10.1%Explosive rate10.4%
- -3.54CPOE-0.95
- 36.9%Third-down rate35.9%
- 72.1%Red-zone TD rate71.1%
- 1.95Points / drive1.75
- 1.6%Turnover rate2.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CIN lead 32–22 since 1999
Meetings average 42.7 points. CLE are 24-29-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CIN–CLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 30 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 12:13 | 8 | 28 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CLE | Q1 6:58 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 4:21 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CLE | Q1 2:43 | 13 | 74 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CIN | Q2 10:20 | 3 | -11 | Punt | 0–7 |
| CLE | Q2 8:45 | 3 | 70 | Touchdown | 0–13 |
| CIN | Q2 7:12 | 6 | 19 | Punt | 0–13 |
| CLE | Q2 4:55 | 9 | 61 | Field goal | 0–16 |
| CIN | Q2 0:10 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 0–16 |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 39 | Punt | 0–16 |
| CLE | Q3 9:51 | 9 | 87 | Touchdown | 0–23 |
| CIN | Q3 4:53 | 9 | 36 | Field goal | 3–23 |
| CLE | Q4 14:55 | 14 | 72 | Field goal | 3–26 |
| CIN | Q4 7:26 | 6 | 75 | Touchdown | 10–26 |
| CLE | Q4 4:56 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 10–26 |
| CIN | Q4 3:53 | 3 | 23 | Touchdown | 18–26 |
| CLE | Q4 2:56 | 3 | 76 | End of half | 18–26 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Driskel | 13/19 | 133 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Mixon | 17 | 68 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Jeff Driskel | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 |
| John Ross | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Uzomah | 4 | 5 | 49 | 1 |
| Cody Core | 2 | 3 | 36 | 0 |
| Alex Erickson | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 |
| Joe Mixon | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| John Ross | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Giovani Bernard | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Browns
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 27/37 | 284 | 3 | 0 |
| Jarvis Landry | 1/1 | 63 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Chubb | 19 | 112 | 5.9 | 0 |
| Baker Mayfield | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 |
| Duke Johnson | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Jarvis Landry | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breshad Perriman | 2 | 4 | 76 | 0 |
| David Njoku | 3 | 4 | 73 | 1 |
| Rashard Higgins | 6 | 7 | 60 | 1 |
| Duke Johnson | 6 | 6 | 54 | 0 |
| Jarvis Landry | 4 | 8 | 47 | 0 |
| Darren Fells | 3 | 3 | 18 | 1 |
| Dontrell Hilliard | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
| Nick Chubb | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Seth DeValve | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Antonio Callaway | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Bengals.
Half-point at risk
3.29%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
63.6%
Expected total
46.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.70
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment+1.96
- Rest differential+0.08
- Expected margin+5.47



