2019 · Week 1

Final / OT

Colts

Indianapolis

QB Jacoby Brissett

24·30

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Philip Rivers

StubHub Center · outdoors · grass · 77°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

LAC -6

Total

44.5

Model margin

+1.3est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

3.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Colts

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsColts wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Coltsedge mapChargers
  • +0.009EPA / play+0.036
  • 44.5%Success rate47.3%
  • -0.001EPA / dropback+0.118
  • +0.022EPA / rush-0.118
  • 8.5%Explosive rate9.0%
  • -3.86CPOE+3.58
  • 41.9%Third-down rate45.5%
  • 68.0%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
  • 1.94Points / drive1.99
  • 1.8%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 8–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46 points. LAC are 8-4-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W7IND @ LAC3824IND
2022 · W16LAC @ IND203CHARGERS
2016 · W3SD @ IND2226IND
2013 · W6IND @ SD919CHARGERS
2010 · W12SD @ IND3614CHARGERS
2008 · playoffsIND @ SD1723CHARGERS
2008 · W12IND @ SD2320IND
2007 · playoffsSD @ IND2824CHARGERS

Box score

Individual performances

Colts

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jacoby Brissett21/2719020

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Marlon Mack251747.01
Nyheim Hines4133.30
Jacoby Brissett393.00
Parris Campbell177.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
T.Y. Hilton89872
Deon Cain22350
Devin Funchess35320
Jack Doyle12200
Eric Ebron1380
Nyheim Hines4440
Mo Alie-Cox1130
Parris Campbell1110

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Philip Rivers25/3433331

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler12584.81
Justin Jackson6579.50
Philip Rivers166.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +64.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Colts.

Half-point at risk

3.02%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.5%

Expected total

45.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.48
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.26