2025 · Week 7

Final

Colts

Indianapolis

QB Daniel Jones

38·24

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

LAC -2.5

Total

48.5

Model margin

+3.4est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Availability

The injury report

The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.

Colts

Chargers

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Colts

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsColts wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Coltsedge mapChargers
  • +0.083EPA / play-0.016
  • 46.6%Success rate43.6%
  • +0.104EPA / dropback+0.021
  • +0.052EPA / rush-0.080
  • 8.1%Explosive rate7.4%
  • +0.62CPOE+0.01
  • 43.0%Third-down rate46.7%
  • 71.1%Red-zone TD rate48.9%
  • 2.74Points / drive2.10
  • 2.0%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 8–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46 points. LAC are 8-4-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2022 · W16LAC @ IND20–3CHARGERS
2019 · W1IND @ LAC24–30CHARGERS
2016 · W3SD @ IND22–26IND
2013 · W6IND @ SD9–19CHARGERS
2010 · W12SD @ IND36–14CHARGERS
2008 · playoffsIND @ SD17–23CHARGERS
2008 · W12IND @ SD23–20IND
2007 · playoffsSD @ IND28–24CHARGERS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultIND–LAC
INDQ1 15:00575Touchdown6–0
LACQ1 12:36924Field goal6–3
INDQ1 7:351770Touchdown13–3
LACQ2 14:54420Punt13–3
INDQ2 13:30970Touchdown20–3
LACQ2 8:56537Turnover20–3
INDQ2 6:383-3Punt20–3
LACQ2 5:42960Turnover20–3
INDQ2 1:54762Field goal23–3
LACQ3 15:00670Touchdown23–10
INDQ3 13:01214Touchdown31–10
LACQ3 12:031181Touchdown31–17
INDQ3 6:13573Touchdown38–17
LACQ3 3:331176Touchdown38–24
INDQ4 13:4038Punt38–24
LACQ4 12:412177Turnover on downs38–24
INDQ4 3:27435End of half38–24

Box score

Individual performances

Colts

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daniel Jones23/3428820

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jonathan Taylor16945.93
Ameer Abdullah2199.50
Daniel Jones571.40

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Justin Herbert37/5542032

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Justin Herbert6315.20
Kimani Vidal9202.20
Hassan Haskins133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.53.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Colts.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.1%

Expected total

42.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.66
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.36