2019 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Seahawks

Seattle

QB Russell Wilson

27·10

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kyler Murray

State Farm Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

SEA -5.5

Total

49

Model margin

+1.2est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Seahawks

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsSeahawks wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Seahawksedge mapCardinals
  • +0.018EPA / play+0.014
  • 45.5%Success rate42.7%
  • +0.119EPA / dropback+0.020
  • -0.134EPA / rush+0.004
  • 9.6%Explosive rate9.9%
  • +7.05CPOE-1.81
  • 39.1%Third-down rate36.0%
  • 65.9%Red-zone TD rate57.8%
  • 1.86Points / drive1.85
  • 1.8%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SEA lead 30–17–1 since 1999

SEA have won 9 straight. Meetings average 43.5 points. ARI are 21-26-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W10ARI @ SEA2244SEA
2025 · W4SEA @ ARI2320SEA
2024 · W14SEA @ ARI3018SEA
2024 · W12ARI @ SEA616SEA
2023 · W18SEA @ ARI2120SEA
2023 · W7ARI @ SEA1020SEA
2022 · W9SEA @ ARI3121SEA
2022 · W6ARI @ SEA919SEA

Box score

Individual performances

Seahawks

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Russell Wilson22/2824010

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Carson221044.70
Russell Wilson273.50
C.J. Prosise341.31

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Will Dissly78571
Tyler Lockett44510
Jaron Brown33500
Chris Carson44410
Luke Willson22260
David Moore1290
DK Metcalf1460

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyler Murray22/3224101

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson11403.60
Chase Edmonds6376.20
Kyler Murray4276.81
Christian Kirk166.00
Andy Isabella155.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -5.54.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Seahawks.

Half-point at risk

1.79%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

52.4%

Expected total

45.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.51
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.23