2019 · Week 4 · Division

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Case Keenum

3·24

Giants

New York

QB Daniel Jones

MetLife Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 77°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

NYG -3

Total

48

Model margin

+3.2est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapGiants
  • -0.130EPA / play-0.064
  • 38.8%Success rate41.8%
  • -0.110EPA / dropback-0.034
  • -0.164EPA / rush-0.129
  • 8.3%Explosive rate8.9%
  • -2.94CPOE-1.92
  • 29.0%Third-down rate37.8%
  • 55.3%Red-zone TD rate69.6%
  • 1.49Points / drive1.56
  • 2.3%Turnover rate3.1%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999

WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. NYG are 28-24-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15WAS @ NYG2921WAS
2025 · W1NYG @ WAS621WAS
2024 · W9WAS @ NYG2722WAS
2024 · W2NYG @ WAS1821WAS
2023 · W11NYG @ WAS3119NYG
2023 · W7WAS @ NYG714NYG
2022 · W15NYG @ WAS2012NYG
2022 · W13WAS @ NYG2020Tie

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Dwayne Haskins9/1710703
Case Keenum6/113701

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson11282.50
Dwayne Haskins22311.50
Chris Thompson441.00

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daniel Jones23/3122512

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Wayne Gallman18633.51
Jon Hilliman10333.30
Daniel Jones5336.60
Sterling Shepard12323.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Sterling Shepard79760
Wayne Gallman67551
Evan Engram47540
Rhett Ellison34240
Darius Slayton22130
Bennie Fowler1230

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.9%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.7%

Expected total

43.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.39
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin+3.21