2019 · Week 5

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Chase Daniel

21·24

Raiders

Oakland

QB Derek Carr

Tottenham Stadium · outdoors · grass · 59°F · wind 15mph

Closing spread

CHI -6.5

Total

39.5

Model margin

+0.0est.

OAK perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Raiders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Raiders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

CHI lead 6–3 since 1999

CHI have won 3 straight. Meetings average 40.1 points. OAK are 2-6-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W4CHI @ LV2524CHI
2023 · W7LV @ CHI1230CHI
2021 · W5CHI @ LV209CHI
2015 · W4OAK @ CHI2022CHI
2011 · W12CHI @ OAK2025RAIDERS
2007 · W10CHI @ OAK176CHI
2003 · W5OAK @ CHI2124CHI
1999 · W3CHI @ OAK1724RAIDERS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chase Daniel22/3023122

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Montgomery11252.31
Tarik Cohen4102.50
Cordarrelle Patterson155.00
Chase Daniel122.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Allen Robinson79972
Anthony Miller47520
Tarik Cohen67390
Trey Burton33160
J.P. Holtz12160
David Montgomery11110
Javon Wims0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -6.52.7%4.4%2.9%7.4%7.4%2.9%4.4%

Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.92%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.1%

Expected total

43.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.66
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.38
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.02

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.