2019 · Week 6 · Division

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

17·23

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Lamar Jackson

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · grass · 64°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

BAL -10.5

Total

47

Model margin

+7.6est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapRavens
  • -0.097EPA / play+0.203
  • 40.3%Success rate48.1%
  • -0.076EPA / dropback+0.322
  • -0.137EPA / rush+0.088
  • 8.1%Explosive rate12.0%
  • -5.27CPOE+3.13
  • 36.0%Third-down rate48.0%
  • 51.4%Red-zone TD rate68.9%
  • 1.31Points / drive2.90
  • 2.6%Turnover rate1.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. BAL are 25-28-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton21/3923501

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alex Erickson11717.00
Joe Mixon8101.30
Giovani Bernard441.00
Andy Dalton122.01

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Auden Tate511910
Alex Erickson46470
Joe Mixon23290
C.J. Uzomah23260
Giovani Bernard23200
Tyler Eifert22130
Tyler Boyd37100
Damion Willis0100
Drew Sample11-10

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Lamar Jackson21/3323600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Jackson191528.01
Mark Ingram13524.01
Gus Edwards6345.70
Justice Hill5316.20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +10.55.7%7.2%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.3%2.7%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

1.66%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

68.9%

Expected total

44.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+5.89
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+7.63