Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2019 · Week 13 · Division

Final

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

34·7

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kyler Murray

State Farm Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

LA -2.5

Total

47

Model margin

+1.1est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ramsedge mapCardinals
  • +0.001EPA / play+0.014
  • 44.3%Success rate42.7%
  • +0.089EPA / dropback+0.020
  • -0.159EPA / rush+0.004
  • 10.3%Explosive rate9.9%
  • -1.88CPOE-1.81
  • 38.8%Third-down rate36.0%
  • 62.9%Red-zone TD rate57.8%
  • 1.95Points / drive1.85
  • 2.2%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–20 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43 points. ARI are 23-25-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18ARI @ LA2037RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI4517RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA913RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI1041ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI3714RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA926RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA2717ARI
2022 · W3LA @ ARI2012RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff32/4342420
Blake Bortles1/2300

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley19955.01
Malcolm Brown6305.00
Darrell Henderson4174.30
Blake Bortles1-10-10.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Robert Woods13181720
Tyler Higbee781071
Cooper Kupp66651
Josh Reynolds44390
Brandin Cooks22240
Todd Gurley11200
Malcolm Brown0100
Johnny Mundt0100

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyler Murray19/3416301

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kenyan Drake13312.40
Kyler Murray4287.01
David Johnson4153.80

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.54.2%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.6%2.8%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

2.09%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.9%

Expected total

45.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.32
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.64
  • Expected margin+1.06