2019 · Week 15 · Division
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 52°F · wind 13mph
Closing spread
PHI -7
Total
38
Model margin
-5.0est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
4.9%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Eagles
- OutLane JohnsonTAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableDerek BarnettDEAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableJordan HowardRBShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableNelson AgholorWRKnee· DNP
- QuestionableRonald DarbyCBHip Flexor· Limited
- DNPAlshon JefferyWRFoot
Commanders
- OutPaul RichardsonWRHamstring· DNP
- OutTrey QuinnWRConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableBrandon ScherffGElbow· Limited
- QuestionableFabian MoreauCBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableJosh NormanCBIllness· Full
- QuestionableMontae NicholsonSAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableQuinton DunbarCBHamstring· DNP
- DNPRyan KerriganLBCalf
Win probability
- Commanders
- Eagles
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.004EPA / play-0.130
- 44.9%Success rate38.8%
- +0.069EPA / dropback-0.110
- -0.105EPA / rush-0.164
- 8.4%Explosive rate8.3%
- -1.01CPOE-2.94
- 45.1%Third-down rate29.0%
- 64.4%Red-zone TD rate55.3%
- 2.01Points / drive1.49
- 1.7%Turnover rate2.3%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PHI lead 35–22 since 1999
Meetings average 45.4 points. WAS are 27-27-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PHI–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 39 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PHI | Q1 9:03 | 15 | 87 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| WAS | Q1 1:23 | 1 | 75 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| PHI | Q1 1:11 | 13 | 70 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| WAS | Q2 9:53 | 9 | 56 | Touchdown | 10–14 |
| PHI | Q2 6:58 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 10–14 |
| WAS | Q2 6:24 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 10–14 |
| PHI | Q2 5:03 | 7 | 32 | Punt | 10–14 |
| WAS | Q2 1:46 | 7 | 40 | Punt | 10–14 |
| PHI | Q2 0:40 | 1 | 5 | End of half | 10–14 |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 10–14 |
| WAS | Q3 13:28 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 10–14 |
| PHI | Q3 11:55 | 13 | 56 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| WAS | Q3 5:53 | 10 | 75 | Touchdown | 17–21 |
| PHI | Q4 14:53 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 24–21 |
| WAS | Q4 9:59 | 5 | 30 | Field goal | 24–24 |
| PHI | Q4 8:02 | 3 | 8 | Turnover | 24–24 |
| WAS | Q4 6:28 | 3 | 9 | Field goal | 24–27 |
| PHI | Q4 4:52 | 11 | 75 | Touchdown | 31–27 |
| WAS | Q4 0:26 | 3 | 17 | Opp touchdown | 37–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Wentz | 30/43 | 266 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miles Sanders | 19 | 122 | 6.4 | 1 |
| Boston Scott | 6 | 26 | 4.3 | 0 |
| Carson Wentz | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Ertz | 5 | 10 | 61 | 1 |
| Greg Ward | 7 | 9 | 61 | 1 |
| Dallas Goedert | 5 | 6 | 55 | 0 |
| Miles Sanders | 6 | 6 | 50 | 1 |
| Boston Scott | 7 | 7 | 39 | 0 |
| J.J. Arcega-Whiteside | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dwayne Haskins | 19/28 | 261 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Peterson | 16 | 66 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Dwayne Haskins | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 |
| Josh Ferguson | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry McLaurin | 5 | 5 | 130 | 1 |
| Steven Sims | 5 | 11 | 45 | 1 |
| Chris Thompson | 2 | 3 | 26 | 0 |
| Adrian Peterson | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0 |
| Kelvin Harmon | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| Jeremy Sprinkle | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Eagles.
Half-point at risk
4.94%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
35.8%
Expected total
43.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.97
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment-2.88
- Rest differential+0.08
- Expected margin-5.03



