2019 · Week 16 · Division

Final / OT

Giants

New York

QB Daniel Jones

41·35

Commanders

Washington

QB Dwayne Haskins

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 44°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

NYG -1

Total

42

Model margin

-2.5est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.064EPA / play-0.130
  • 41.8%Success rate38.8%
  • -0.034EPA / dropback-0.110
  • -0.129EPA / rush-0.164
  • 8.9%Explosive rate8.3%
  • -1.92CPOE-2.94
  • 37.8%Third-down rate29.0%
  • 69.6%Red-zone TD rate55.3%
  • 1.56Points / drive1.49
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999

WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. WAS are 24-28-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15WAS @ NYG2921WAS
2025 · W1NYG @ WAS621WAS
2024 · W9WAS @ NYG2722WAS
2024 · W2NYG @ WAS1821WAS
2023 · W11NYG @ WAS3119NYG
2023 · W7WAS @ NYG714NYG
2022 · W15NYG @ WAS2012NYG
2022 · W13WAS @ NYG2020Tie

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daniel Jones28/4235250

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Saquon Barkley221898.61
Daniel Jones3124.00
Da'Mari Scott155.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Golden Tate611960
Saquon Barkley44901
Sterling Shepard66761
Cody Latimer57441
Kaden Smith68352
Da'Mari Scott11110
Darius Slayton0200

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Case Keenum16/2215810
Dwayne Haskins12/1513320
Kelvin Harmon1/11100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson15362.41
Chris Thompson8344.30
Steven Sims294.50
Case Keenum111.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -12.6%3.0%4.7%3.1%7.5%7.0%2.7%4.0%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

2.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

42.3%

Expected total

43.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.39
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.88
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-2.53