2019 · Week 16 · Division
Final / OTFedExField · outdoors · grass · 44°F · wind 6mph
Closing spread
NYG -1
Total
42
Model margin
-2.5est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Giants
- OutRhett EllisonTEConcussion· Limited
Commanders
- OutQuinton DunbarCBHamstring· DNP
- DoubtfulFabian MoreauCBHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableLandon CollinsSAchilles· Full
Win probability
- Commanders
- Giants
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.064EPA / play-0.130
- 41.8%Success rate38.8%
- -0.034EPA / dropback-0.110
- -0.129EPA / rush-0.164
- 8.9%Explosive rate8.3%
- -1.92CPOE-2.94
- 37.8%Third-down rate29.0%
- 69.6%Red-zone TD rate55.3%
- 1.56Points / drive1.49
- 3.1%Turnover rate2.3%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NYG lead 32–21–2 since 1999
Meetings average 40.1 points. WAS are 24-29-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYG–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| WAS | Q1 12:21 | 9 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| NYG | Q1 7:37 | 2 | 75 | Touchdown | 14–7 |
| WAS | Q1 6:46 | 12 | 75 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| NYG | Q2 14:56 | 10 | 70 | Touchdown | 21–14 |
| WAS | Q2 9:16 | 7 | 34 | Punt | 21–14 |
| NYG | Q2 5:42 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 21–14 |
| WAS | Q2 3:53 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 21–14 |
| NYG | Q2 2:19 | 9 | 58 | Touchdown | 28–14 |
| WAS | Q2 0:38 | 3 | 9 | End of half | 28–14 |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 7 | Punt | 28–14 |
| NYG | Q3 11:44 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 28–14 |
| WAS | Q3 10:19 | 7 | 60 | Touchdown | 28–21 |
| NYG | Q3 6:38 | 6 | 73 | Touchdown | 35–21 |
| WAS | Q3 3:40 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 35–21 |
| NYG | Q3 2:06 | 4 | 15 | Punt | 35–21 |
| WAS | Q4 14:38 | 2 | 1 | Touchdown | 35–28 |
| NYG | Q4 14:30 | 5 | 40 | Missed field goal | 35–28 |
| WAS | Q4 11:20 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 35–28 |
| NYG | Q4 9:30 | 6 | 33 | Punt | 35–28 |
| WAS | Q4 6:28 | 15 | 98 | Touchdown | 35–35 |
| NYG | Q4 0:29 | 5 | 30 | End of half | 35–35 |
| NYG | OT | 11 | 66 | Touchdown | 41–35 |
Box score
Individual performances
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 28/42 | 352 | 5 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 22 | 189 | 8.6 | 1 |
| Daniel Jones | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Da'Mari Scott | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Tate | 6 | 11 | 96 | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 4 | 4 | 90 | 1 |
| Sterling Shepard | 6 | 6 | 76 | 1 |
| Cody Latimer | 5 | 7 | 44 | 1 |
| Kaden Smith | 6 | 8 | 35 | 2 |
| Da'Mari Scott | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Darius Slayton | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Keenum | 16/22 | 158 | 1 | 0 |
| Dwayne Haskins | 12/15 | 133 | 2 | 0 |
| Kelvin Harmon | 1/1 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Peterson | 15 | 36 | 2.4 | 1 |
| Chris Thompson | 8 | 34 | 4.3 | 0 |
| Steven Sims | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Case Keenum | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry McLaurin | 7 | 9 | 86 | 0 |
| Steven Sims | 6 | 10 | 64 | 2 |
| Kelvin Harmon | 5 | 6 | 58 | 0 |
| Hale Hentges | 2 | 2 | 28 | 1 |
| Adrian Peterson | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Chris Thompson | 4 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
| Cam Sims | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
| Jeremy Sprinkle | 2 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Giants.
Half-point at risk
2.15%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
42.3%
Expected total
43.7est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.39
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment-2.88
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-2.53



