Closing spread
BUF -1.5
Total
46.5
Model margin
+2.8est.
BUF perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Rams
- OutCam AkersRBRibs· DNP
- QuestionableDarious WilliamsCBAnkle· Limited
- DNPJoseph NoteboomGCalf
Bills
- OutDawson KnoxTEConcussion· DNP
- OutDel'Shawn PhillipsLBQuadricep· DNP
- OutZack MossRBToe· DNP
- QuestionableMatt MilanoLBHamstring· Full
- QuestionableTaron JohnsonCBGroin· Full
- QuestionableTremaine EdmundsLBShoulder· Limited
- LimitedJake FrommQBNot Injury Related
Win probability
- Bills
- Rams
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.013EPA / play+0.169
- 44.6%Success rate50.4%
- +0.032EPA / dropback+0.298
- -0.081EPA / rush-0.081
- 9.2%Explosive rate10.7%
- +0.37CPOE+6.29
- 44.2%Third-down rate49.9%
- 59.0%Red-zone TD rate68.4%
- 1.76Points / drive2.78
- 2.1%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BUF lead 6–2 since 1999
Meetings average 55 points. BUF are 6-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | LA–BUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LA | Q1 13:53 | 9 | 53 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 8:07 | 12 | 57 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| LA | Q1 1:41 | 7 | 31 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| BUF | Q2 13:59 | 7 | 66 | Touchdown | 0–14 |
| LA | Q2 10:04 | 12 | 63 | Field goal | 3–14 |
| BUF | Q2 3:09 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 3–21 |
| LA | Q2 0:38 | 4 | 14 | End of half | 3–21 |
| LA | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 27 | Turnover on downs | 3–21 |
| BUF | Q3 12:21 | 8 | 62 | Touchdown | 3–28 |
| LA | Q3 8:05 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 10–28 |
| BUF | Q3 4:47 | 2 | 2 | Turnover | 10–28 |
| LA | Q3 4:13 | 3 | 59 | Touchdown | 17–28 |
| BUF | Q3 2:52 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 17–28 |
| LA | Q3 1:17 | 11 | 107 | Touchdown | 25–28 |
| BUF | Q4 10:34 | 6 | 32 | Turnover | 25–28 |
| LA | Q4 7:25 | 6 | 37 | Touchdown | 32–28 |
| BUF | Q4 4:30 | 13 | 80 | Touchdown | 32–35 |
| LA | Q4 0:15 | 1 | 12 | Turnover | 32–35 |
Box score
Individual performances
Rams
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff | 23/32 | 321 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrell Henderson | 20 | 114 | 5.7 | 1 |
| Robert Woods | 3 | 30 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Malcolm Brown | 7 | 19 | 2.7 | 0 |
| Jared Goff | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Kupp | 9 | 10 | 107 | 1 |
| Robert Woods | 5 | 6 | 74 | 1 |
| Josh Reynolds | 4 | 5 | 60 | 0 |
| Tyler Higbee | 2 | 2 | 40 | 0 |
| Gerald Everett | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 |
| Darrell Henderson | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Malcolm Brown | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Van Jefferson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 24/33 | 311 | 4 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Singletary | 13 | 71 | 5.5 | 0 |
| T.J. Yeldon | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 4 | 8 | 2.0 | 1 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cole Beasley | 6 | 7 | 100 | 0 |
| Gabe Davis | 4 | 4 | 81 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 4 | 5 | 50 | 0 |
| Stefon Diggs | 4 | 6 | 49 | 1 |
| Tyler Kroft | 4 | 5 | 24 | 2 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Lee Smith | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| John Brown | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Rams.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.6%
Expected total
40.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.12
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.82



