2020 · Week 9 · Division

Final

Giants

New York

QB Daniel Jones

23·20

Commanders

Washington

QB Kyle Allen

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 75°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

43

Model margin

+8.1est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

7.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Giants

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsGiants wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Giantsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.057EPA / play-0.051
  • 42.1%Success rate42.1%
  • -0.051EPA / dropback-0.063
  • -0.067EPA / rush-0.030
  • 7.5%Explosive rate7.7%
  • -2.04CPOE-1.32
  • 35.1%Third-down rate40.2%
  • 51.7%Red-zone TD rate63.6%
  • 1.57Points / drive1.76
  • 2.1%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999

WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. WAS are 24-28-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15WAS @ NYG2921WAS
2025 · W1NYG @ WAS621WAS
2024 · W9WAS @ NYG2722WAS
2024 · W2NYG @ WAS1821WAS
2023 · W11NYG @ WAS3119NYG
2023 · W7WAS @ NYG714NYG
2022 · W15NYG @ WAS2012NYG
2022 · W13WAS @ NYG2020Tie

Box score

Individual performances

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daniel Jones23/3421210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Wayne Gallman14684.91
Alfred Morris9677.40
Sterling Shepard11818.00
Dion Lewis351.70
Daniel Jones640.70
Darius Slayton122.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Alex Smith24/3232513
Kyle Allen5/76200

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Antonio Gibson6203.31
J.D. McKissic3175.70

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Terry McLaurin781151
Cam Sims341100
J.D. McKissic914650
Antonio Gibson33350
Isaiah Wright33300
Logan Thomas36280
Steven Sims1140

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.9%5.6%7.1%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Giants.

Half-point at risk

7.08%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

69.9%

Expected total

39.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.57
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.13
  • Rest differential+0.64
  • Expected margin+8.05