Closing spread
LA -1
Total
42
Model margin
+3.4est.
LA perspective
Push chance
2.1%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Cardinals
- QuestionableBudda BakerSNeck· DNP
- QuestionableChase EdmondsRBHip· DNP
- QuestionableDarrell DanielsTEHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableLarry FitzgeraldWRGroin· DNP
- QuestionableMaxx WilliamsTEAnkle· Limited
- DNPChris BanjoSHip
Rams
- OutJared GoffQBThumb· DNP
- OutMicah KiserLBKnee· DNP
- QuestionableCam AkersRBAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableLeonard FloydLBAbdomen· DNP
- DNPMichael BrockersDENot Injury Related
Win probability
- Rams
- Cardinals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.051EPA / play-0.013
- 46.0%Success rate44.6%
- +0.087EPA / dropback+0.032
- -0.009EPA / rush-0.081
- 9.3%Explosive rate9.2%
- +2.07CPOE+0.37
- 40.2%Third-down rate44.2%
- 71.9%Red-zone TD rate59.0%
- 2.19Points / drive1.76
- 1.9%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
LA lead 29–21 since 1999
Meetings average 42.8 points. LA are 25-24-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ARI–LA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 16 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LA | Q1 11:31 | 2 | 10 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| ARI | Q1 10:48 | 2 | 14 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| LA | Q1 10:09 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 7–0 |
| ARI | Q1 8:30 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–0 |
| LA | Q1 7:01 | 16 | 83 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| ARI | Q2 14:17 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LA | Q2 13:01 | 13 | 81 | Turnover | 7–3 |
| ARI | Q2 6:04 | 2 | 1 | Safety | 7–5 |
| LA | Q2 5:21 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–5 |
| ARI | Q2 2:59 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 7–5 |
| LA | Q2 1:53 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–5 |
| ARI | Q2 1:14 | 5 | 15 | Opp touchdown | 7–12 |
| ARI | Q2 0:20 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–12 |
| LA | Q3 15:00 | 14 | 59 | Field goal | 7–15 |
| ARI | Q3 6:16 | 6 | 52 | Punt | 7–15 |
| LA | Q3 3:11 | 10 | 71 | Field goal | 7–18 |
| ARI | Q4 14:25 | 10 | 56 | Missed field goal | 7–18 |
| LA | Q4 9:01 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–18 |
| ARI | Q4 7:49 | 8 | 23 | Punt | 7–18 |
| LA | Q4 4:24 | 6 | 12 | Punt | 7–18 |
| ARI | Q4 0:19 | 3 | 28 | End of half | 7–18 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cardinals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Streveler | 11/16 | 105 | 1 | 1 |
| Kyler Murray | 8/11 | 87 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenyan Drake | 10 | 36 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Chris Streveler | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Kyler Murray | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Chase Edmonds | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Arnold | 3 | 3 | 46 | 0 |
| Trent Sherfield | 4 | 6 | 44 | 0 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 4 | 10 | 35 | 0 |
| Chase Edmonds | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 |
| Kenyan Drake | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| KeeSean Johnson | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Jonathan Ward | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
Rams
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Wolford | 22/38 | 231 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Wolford | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 0 |
| Cam Akers | 21 | 34 | 1.6 | 0 |
| Malcolm Brown | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Akers | 4 | 4 | 52 | 0 |
| Van Jefferson | 4 | 8 | 50 | 0 |
| Tyler Higbee | 3 | 4 | 41 | 0 |
| Robert Woods | 4 | 7 | 36 | 0 |
| Josh Reynolds | 4 | 6 | 29 | 0 |
| Gerald Everett | 2 | 7 | 25 | 0 |
| Malcolm Brown | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Cardinals.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
58.2%
Expected total
38.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.65
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment+0.13
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+3.41



