Closing spread
LAC -7
Total
43
Model margin
-1.7est.
KC perspective
Push chance
4.6%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Chargers
- OutBryan BulagaTFoot· DNP
- OutCasey HaywardCBHamstring· DNP
- OutJoey BosaDEShin· DNP
- OutMalik JeffersonLBShoulder· DNP
- OutRayshawn JenkinsSAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableJahleel AddaeSCalf· DNP
- QuestionableSam TeviTKnee· Limited
- DNPKeenan AllenWRHamstring
Chiefs
- OutBen NiemannLBHamstring· DNP
- OutClyde Edwards-HelaireRBAnkle· DNP
- OutMike RemmersTBack· DNP
- OutSammy WatkinsWRCalf· DNP
- OutTyreek HillWRHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableDerrick NnadiDTKnee· DNP
- QuestionableLe'Veon BellRBKnee· Limited
- LimitedDamien WilsonLBKnee
Win probability
- Chiefs
- Chargers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.043EPA / play+0.177
- 43.8%Success rate50.2%
- +0.154EPA / dropback+0.288
- -0.141EPA / rush-0.056
- 7.9%Explosive rate11.0%
- +0.07CPOE+2.60
- 45.1%Third-down rate49.5%
- 60.1%Red-zone TD rate70.8%
- 2.02Points / drive2.85
- 1.3%Turnover rate1.4%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
KC lead 32–23 since 1999
Meetings average 44.6 points. KC are 27-27-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | LAC–KC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 53 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| LAC | Q1 11:19 | 12 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| KC | Q1 4:23 | 13 | 67 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| LAC | Q2 13:41 | 5 | 23 | Punt | 7–14 |
| LAC | Q2 11:57 | 4 | 17 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| KC | Q2 9:51 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 14–14 |
| LAC | Q2 8:17 | 15 | 77 | Turnover on downs | 14–14 |
| KC | Q2 1:54 | 2 | -1 | Safety | 16–14 |
| LAC | Q2 1:43 | 7 | 23 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| KC | Q2 0:16 | 1 | -1 | End of half | 24–14 |
| LAC | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 22 | Punt | 24–14 |
| KC | Q3 11:08 | 13 | 63 | Turnover on downs | 24–14 |
| LAC | Q3 4:04 | 6 | 70 | Touchdown | 31–14 |
| KC | Q3 0:47 | 9 | 74 | Touchdown | 31–21 |
| LAC | Q4 11:49 | 6 | 77 | Touchdown | 38–21 |
| KC | Q4 8:09 | 4 | 10 | Punt | 38–21 |
| LAC | Q4 5:24 | 6 | 34 | End of half | 38–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 22/31 | 302 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Jackson | 9 | 72 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Kalen Ballage | 13 | 36 | 2.8 | 1 |
| Austin Ekeler | 7 | 18 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Justin Herbert | 6 | 9 | 1.5 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Williams | 6 | 7 | 108 | 1 |
| Stephen Anderson | 3 | 3 | 52 | 0 |
| Donald Parham | 3 | 4 | 37 | 1 |
| Tyron Johnson | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 6 | 7 | 33 | 1 |
| Justin Jackson | 1 | 2 | 32 | 0 |
| Jalen Guyton | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Chiefs
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Henne | 23/32 | 218 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darwin Thompson | 14 | 45 | 3.2 | 1 |
| Chad Henne | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darwin Thompson | 7 | 7 | 65 | 1 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 6 | 7 | 58 | 0 |
| Byron Pringle | 4 | 6 | 52 | 1 |
| Mecole Hardman | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 |
| Gehrig Dieter | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| Deon Yelder | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| Darrel Williams | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Chiefs; negative favour Chargers.
Half-point at risk
4.64%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
44.6%
Expected total
46.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.05
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment-3.33
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-1.68



