Closing spread
TEN -4.5
Total
47
Model margin
+2.1est.
TEN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Colts
- OutBraden SmithTFoot· DNP
- OutJordan GlasgowLBConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableCarson WentzQBAnkles· Limited
- DNPQuenton NelsonGBack
- DNPT.J. CarrieCBKnee
- LimitedShaquille LeonardLBAnkle
Titans
- OutAnthony FirkserTEKnee· DNP
- OutCaleb FarleyCBShoulder· DNP
- OutDerick RobersonLBKnee· DNP
- QuestionableBud DupreeLBKnee· DNP
- QuestionableJayon BrownLBHamstring· Full
- LimitedRodger SaffoldGShoulder
Win probability
- Titans
- Colts
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.060EPA / play+0.025
- 44.6%Success rate44.7%
- +0.055EPA / dropback+0.092
- +0.065EPA / rush-0.054
- 9.8%Explosive rate7.8%
- -2.41CPOE+2.33
- 41.9%Third-down rate43.8%
- 60.3%Red-zone TD rate66.6%
- 2.35Points / drive2.15
- 1.5%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
IND lead 34–16 since 1999
Meetings average 46.3 points. TEN are 21-29 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | IND–TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| IND | Q1 13:10 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 12:08 | 11 | 71 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| IND | Q1 6:34 | 4 | 33 | Punt | 0–7 |
| TEN | Q1 4:39 | 9 | 18 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| IND | Q1 0:11 | 9 | 53 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| TEN | Q2 10:19 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| IND | Q2 5:56 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 7–14 |
| TEN | Q2 4:06 | 8 | 57 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| IND | Q2 0:49 | 4 | 17 | Field goal | 10–14 |
| IND | Q3 15:00 | 17 | 57 | Field goal | 13–14 |
| TEN | Q3 6:26 | 7 | 61 | Turnover | 13–14 |
| IND | Q3 2:35 | 5 | 4 | Punt | 13–14 |
| TEN | Q3 0:20 | 6 | 29 | Touchdown | 13–22 |
| IND | Q4 12:56 | 7 | 65 | Field goal | 16–22 |
| TEN | Q4 10:20 | 13 | 67 | Field goal | 16–25 |
| IND | Q4 2:58 | 9 | 37 | Missed field goal | 16–25 |
| TEN | Q4 0:57 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 16–25 |
Box score
Individual performances
Colts
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Wentz | 19/37 | 194 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Taylor | 10 | 64 | 6.4 | 0 |
| Nyheim Hines | 6 | 25 | 4.2 | 1 |
| Michael Pittman | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Ashton Dulin | 1 | -7 | -7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Pittman | 6 | 12 | 68 | 0 |
| Nyheim Hines | 5 | 6 | 54 | 0 |
| Zach Pascal | 2 | 7 | 31 | 0 |
| Mo Alie-Cox | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 |
| Jack Doyle | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| Parris Campbell | 2 | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| Jonathan Taylor | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Tannehill | 18/27 | 197 | 3 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 28 | 113 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Ryan Tannehill | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 0 |
| Jeremy McNichols | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| A.J. Brown | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Mekhi Sargent | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 4 | 4 | 53 | 1 |
| Julio Jones | 3 | 4 | 47 | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | 3 | 3 | 31 | 0 |
| Geoff Swaim | 3 | 4 | 27 | 0 |
| Cameron Batson | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
| Jeremy McNichols | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
| MyCole Pruitt | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Chester Rogers | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| Tommy Hudson | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| A.J. Brown | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Racey McMath | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Colts.
Half-point at risk
1.93%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.6%
Expected total
44.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.36
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.06



