Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2011 · Week 9

Final

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Andy Dalton

24·17

Titans

Tennessee

QB Matt Hasselbeck

LP Field · outdoors · grass · 68°F · wind 13mph

Closing spread

TEN -1.5

Total

41.5

Model margin

+2.6est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Bengals

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsBengals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bengalsedge mapTitans
  • -0.030EPA / play-0.046
  • 41.7%Success rate39.2%
  • +0.005EPA / dropback+0.025
  • -0.080EPA / rush-0.170
  • 8.4%Explosive rate8.7%
  • -2.19CPOE-1.91
  • 35.5%Third-down rate35.9%
  • 53.1%Red-zone TD rate68.0%
  • 1.55Points / drive1.51
  • 1.8%Turnover rate2.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TEN lead 10–9 since 1999

Meetings average 43.3 points. TEN are 6-12-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W15CIN @ TEN3727CIN
2023 · W4CIN @ TEN327TEN
2022 · W12CIN @ TEN2016CIN
2021 · playoffsCIN @ TEN1916CIN
2020 · W8TEN @ CIN2031CIN
2017 · W10CIN @ TEN2024TEN
2014 · W3TEN @ CIN733CIN
2008 · W2TEN @ CIN247TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Andy Dalton22/3921730

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Cedric Benson20783.90
Bernard Scott6244.00
Andy Dalton341.30
Brian Leonard133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
A.J. Green77830
Donald Lee34490
Jerome Simpson310431
Andre Caldwell59221
Colin Cochart2271
Brian Leonard0200
Bernard Scott0100

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Hasselbeck24/4127220

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chris Johnson14644.60
Javon Ringer4112.80
Matt Hasselbeck231.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +1.54.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Bengals.

Half-point at risk

2.13%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.9%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.07
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.56