2023 · Week 3
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 1mph
Closing spread
BUF -5.5
Total
44
Model margin
-3.4est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bills
- DNPJordan PoyerSNot injury related - resting player
- DNPTre'Davious WhiteCBNot injury related - personal matter
Commanders
- OutLogan ThomasTEConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableCurtis SamuelWRIllness· DNP
- QuestionableKamren CurlSIllness· DNP
Win probability
- Commanders
- Bills
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.097EPA / play-0.084
- 48.4%Success rate41.9%
- +0.153EPA / dropback-0.069
- +0.010EPA / rush-0.119
- 8.5%Explosive rate8.0%
- +4.96CPOE+0.32
- 49.7%Third-down rate35.6%
- 68.0%Red-zone TD rate66.6%
- 2.33Points / drive1.53
- 2.4%Turnover rate2.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BUF lead 7–1 since 1999
BUF have won 3 straight. Meetings average 41.9 points. WAS are 1-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BUF–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 10 | 57 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| WAS | Q1 9:29 | 8 | 39 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| BUF | Q1 4:39 | 6 | 14 | Punt | 3–0 |
| WAS | Q1 2:27 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 9–0 |
| BUF | Q1 0:47 | 1 | 35 | Touchdown | 10–0 |
| WAS | Q1 0:41 | 8 | 68 | Turnover on downs | 10–0 |
| BUF | Q2 11:42 | 16 | 87 | Field goal | 13–0 |
| WAS | Q2 1:55 | 3 | 9 | Turnover | 13–0 |
| BUF | Q2 1:15 | 5 | 19 | Field goal | 16–0 |
| WAS | Q2 0:19 | 1 | 10 | End of half | 16–0 |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 63 | Turnover | 16–0 |
| BUF | Q3 9:11 | 7 | 49 | Turnover | 16–0 |
| WAS | Q3 6:27 | 6 | 11 | Punt | 16–0 |
| BUF | Q3 2:28 | 6 | 32 | Turnover on downs | 16–0 |
| WAS | Q4 14:16 | 1 | -2 | Turnover | 16–0 |
| BUF | Q4 14:05 | 6 | 31 | Touchdown | 23–0 |
| WAS | Q4 10:37 | 3 | 5 | Opp touchdown | 30–0 |
| WAS | Q4 10:01 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 30–0 |
| BUF | Q4 8:12 | 9 | 64 | Touchdown | 37–0 |
| WAS | Q4 2:15 | 7 | 42 | Field goal | 37–3 |
| BUF | Q4 0:46 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 37–3 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 20/32 | 218 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 15 | 98 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 1 |
| Latavius Murray | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 1 |
| Damien Harris | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Kyle Allen | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Deonte Harty | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Gabe Davis | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefon Diggs | 8 | 12 | 111 | 0 |
| Gabe Davis | 1 | 4 | 35 | 1 |
| Trent Sherfield | 2 | 3 | 18 | 0 |
| Deonte Harty | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| James Cook | 2 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Latavius Murray | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Khalil Shakir | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Dalton Kincaid | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Howell | 19/29 | 170 | 0 | 4 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Robinson | 10 | 70 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Sam Howell | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 |
| Antonio Gibson | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtis Samuel | 2 | 4 | 54 | 0 |
| Terry McLaurin | 6 | 6 | 41 | 0 |
| Cole Turner | 4 | 7 | 35 | 0 |
| Jahan Dotson | 2 | 4 | 21 | 0 |
| John Bates | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Antonio Gibson | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bills.
Half-point at risk
1.96%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
40.0%
Expected total
44.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-5.10
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-3.40



