Closing spread
MIN -1
Total
41.5
Model margin
-0.1est.
GB perspective
Push chance
2.2%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Vikings
- OutBrian AsamoahLBAnkle· DNP
- OutKene NwangwuRBIllness
- QuestionableEzra ClevelandGFoot· Limited
- QuestionableJalen NailorWRHamstring· Limited
Packers
- QuestionableDe'Vondre CampbellLBAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableJaire AlexanderCBBack· Limited
- QuestionableJosh MyersCAnkle· Full
- QuestionableLuke MusgraveTEAnkle· Limited
- LimitedAaron JonesRBHamstring
- LimitedElgton JenkinsGKnee
- LimitedYosuah NijmanTKnee
Win probability
- Packers
- Vikings
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.025EPA / play+0.075
- 43.2%Success rate45.1%
- +0.039EPA / dropback+0.155
- -0.158EPA / rush-0.054
- 9.4%Explosive rate9.2%
- +2.80CPOE+1.07
- 37.5%Third-down rate47.4%
- 56.4%Red-zone TD rate56.0%
- 1.84Points / drive2.16
- 3.0%Turnover rate1.5%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
GB lead 31–24–2 since 1999
MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 46.8 points. GB are 28-29 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | MIN–GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| MIN | Q1 12:38 | 10 | 42 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| GB | Q1 7:07 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| MIN | Q1 6:07 | 9 | 52 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| GB | Q1 1:34 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–0 |
| MIN | Q2 14:53 | 9 | 68 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| GB | Q2 10:13 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 10–0 |
| MIN | Q2 8:14 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 10–0 |
| GB | Q2 4:56 | 15 | 71 | Field goal | 10–3 |
| MIN | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 75 | Touchdown | 17–3 |
| GB | Q3 9:25 | 3 | 2 | Turnover | 23–3 |
| MIN | Q3 7:53 | 1 | 20 | Touchdown | 24–3 |
| GB | Q3 7:48 | 15 | 75 | Touchdown | 24–10 |
| MIN | Q3 2:39 | 13 | 45 | Missed field goal | 24–10 |
| GB | Q4 9:42 | 9 | 46 | Turnover on downs | 24–10 |
| MIN | Q4 7:15 | 3 | 2 | Turnover | 24–10 |
| GB | Q4 5:54 | 4 | 9 | Turnover on downs | 24–10 |
| MIN | Q4 4:46 | 6 | 23 | Punt | 24–10 |
| GB | Q4 2:41 | 7 | 41 | Turnover on downs | 24–10 |
| MIN | Q4 1:17 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 24–10 |
Box score
Individual performances
Vikings
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 23/31 | 274 | 2 | 0 |
| Jaren Hall | 3/4 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Mattison | 16 | 31 | 1.9 | 0 |
| Cam Akers | 9 | 19 | 2.1 | 1 |
| Kirk Cousins | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Brandon Powell | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jordan Addison | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jaren Hall | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K.J. Osborn | 8 | 10 | 99 | 0 |
| T.J. Hockenson | 6 | 9 | 88 | 1 |
| Jordan Addison | 7 | 8 | 82 | 1 |
| Brandon Powell | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Johnny Mundt | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Cam Akers | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Alexander Mattison | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Packers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 24/41 | 229 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Aaron Jones | 7 | 29 | 4.1 | 0 |
| AJ Dillon | 6 | 11 | 1.8 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 6 | 83 | 0 |
| AJ Dillon | 5 | 5 | 41 | 0 |
| Christian Watson | 3 | 8 | 33 | 0 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 2 | 4 | 28 | 0 |
| Romeo Doubs | 4 | 9 | 18 | 1 |
| Aaron Jones | 4 | 5 | 17 | 0 |
| Luke Musgrave | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Packers; negative favour Vikings.
Half-point at risk
2.16%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
48.7%
Expected total
45.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.82
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment-4.74
- Rest differential+0.08
- Expected margin-0.14



