Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2024 · Week 9

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Caleb Williams

9·29

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kyler Murray

State Farm Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -1.5

Total

44.5

Model margin

+4.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCardinals
  • -0.072EPA / play+0.067
  • 40.1%Success rate47.3%
  • -0.036EPA / dropback+0.126
  • -0.142EPA / rush-0.023
  • 5.9%Explosive rate10.0%
  • -0.22CPOE+2.11
  • 33.1%Third-down rate43.0%
  • 61.1%Red-zone TD rate60.3%
  • 1.65Points / drive2.31
  • 1.3%Turnover rate1.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CHI lead 6–4 since 1999

Meetings average 45.1 points. ARI are 6-3-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W16ARI @ CHI1627CHI
2021 · W13ARI @ CHI3322ARI
2018 · W3CHI @ ARI1614CHI
2015 · W2ARI @ CHI4823ARI
2012 · W16CHI @ ARI2813CHI
2009 · W9ARI @ CHI4121ARI
2006 · W6CHI @ ARI2423CHI
2003 · W13ARI @ CHI328CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Caleb Williams22/4121700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
D'Andre Swift16513.20
Roschon Johnson3134.30
Caleb Williams451.30

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Rome Odunze571040
Keenan Allen410360
DJ Moore49330
D'Andre Swift66310
Roschon Johnson2380
Gerald Everett1150

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyler Murray13/2015400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Conner181075.90
Emari Demercado45914.81
Trey Benson8374.61
Kyler Murray263.00
DeeJay Dallas122.00
Trey McBride122.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +1.53.6%6.5%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.10%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

61.2%

Expected total

44.7est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.85
  • Home-field advantage+1.71
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.55