2009 · Week 9

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Kurt Warner

41·21

Bears

Chicago

QB Jay Cutler

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

CHI -1

Total

44.5

Model margin

+1.0est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

2.2%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapBears
  • -0.026EPA / play-0.089
  • 45.3%Success rate39.6%
  • +0.037EPA / dropback-0.064
  • -0.143EPA / rush-0.135
  • 9.9%Explosive rate8.4%
  • +3.71CPOE+0.30
  • 36.7%Third-down rate37.3%
  • 73.5%Red-zone TD rate52.0%
  • 1.75Points / drive1.57
  • 3.4%Turnover rate3.2%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

CHI lead 6–4 since 1999

Meetings average 45.1 points. CHI are 3-6-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W9CHI @ ARI929ARI
2023 · W16ARI @ CHI1627CHI
2021 · W13ARI @ CHI3322ARI
2018 · W3CHI @ ARI1614CHI
2015 · W2ARI @ CHI4823ARI
2012 · W16CHI @ ARI2813CHI
2006 · W6CHI @ ARI2423CHI
2003 · W13ARI @ CHI328CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kurt Warner22/3226150
Matt Leinart0/1001

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower15775.10
Chris Wells13725.50
Steve Breaston12525.00
LaRod Stephens-Howling155.00
Kurt Warner133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Larry Fitzgerald9141232
Steve Breaston56661
Early Doucet44310
Anthony Becht12151
Ben Patrick22151
Tim Hightower13110
Jerheme Urban0100

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Cutler29/4736931

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Forte5336.60
Adrian Peterson22311.50
Jay Cutler3175.70
Devin Hester2-3-1.50

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Devin Hester612940
Earl Bennett711930
Matt Forte68740
Greg Olsen57713
Johnny Knox46300
Desmond Clark1370

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +14.3%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.6%2.8%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

2.16%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.7%

Expected total

43.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.51
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.97