2026 · Week 1
FinalPaycor Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 85°F · wind 7mph
Closing spread
CIN -3.5
Total
50.5
Model margin
+2.8est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Buccaneers
- DoubtfulJalen McMillanWRKnee· Limited
- DoubtfulJustin SkuleTOblique· Limited
- DoubtfulSean TuckerRBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableChristian RozeboomLBFoot· Limited
Bengals
- DoubtfulShemar StewartDEKnee· DNP
- DNPDexter LawrenceDTNot injury related - resting player
- DNPJa'Marr ChaseWRKnee
- LimitedDJ Turner IICBHamstring
Win probability
- Bengals
- Buccaneers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.091EPA / play+0.118
- 41.1%Success rate50.4%
- -0.151EPA / dropback+0.235
- -0.023EPA / rush-0.133
- 8.5%Explosive rate8.1%
- -3.59CPOE+9.08
- 39.8%Third-down rate53.9%
- 53.6%Red-zone TD rate66.5%
- 1.80Points / drive2.60
- 2.3%Turnover rate2.0%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 4–4 since 1999
CIN have won 4 straight. Meetings average 44.8 points. CIN are 3-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TB–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 51 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| CIN | Q1 9:09 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 3–0 |
| TB | Q1 7:38 | 3 | -6 | Opp touchdown | 3–7 |
| TB | Q1 6:18 | 3 | 3 | Turnover | 3–7 |
| CIN | Q1 5:22 | 7 | 33 | Touchdown | 3–14 |
| TB | Q1 1:48 | 9 | 50 | Turnover | 3–14 |
| CIN | Q2 12:04 | 12 | 80 | Touchdown | 3–21 |
| TB | Q2 5:32 | 7 | 70 | Touchdown | 10–21 |
| CIN | Q2 1:49 | 9 | 66 | Field goal | 10–24 |
| TB | Q2 0:06 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–24 |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 36 | Field goal | 10–27 |
| TB | Q3 10:03 | 10 | 33 | Field goal | 13–27 |
| CIN | Q3 3:41 | 3 | 5 | Opp touchdown | 20–27 |
| CIN | Q3 2:16 | 8 | 38 | Field goal | 20–30 |
| TB | Q4 14:04 | 6 | 26 | Turnover | 20–30 |
| CIN | Q4 10:31 | 7 | 35 | Field goal | 20–33 |
| TB | Q4 5:19 | 7 | 56 | Touchdown | 27–33 |
| CIN | Q4 3:19 | 7 | 55 | End of half | 27–33 |
Box score
Individual performances
Buccaneers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 23/28 | 216 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucky Irving | 8 | 45 | 5.6 | 1 |
| Baker Mayfield | 5 | 30 | 6.0 | 1 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Chris Godwin Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Tez Johnson | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emeka Egbuka | 5 | 6 | 63 | 0 |
| Bucky Irving | 7 | 7 | 48 | 0 |
| Chris Godwin Jr. | 4 | 4 | 40 | 0 |
| Ted Hurst III | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 |
| Cade Otton | 3 | 5 | 26 | 0 |
| Kenny Gainwell | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Tez Johnson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow | 25/35 | 254 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase Brown | 16 | 56 | 3.5 | 1 |
| Samaje Perine | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Joe Burrow | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Dohnte Meyers | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Gesicki | 5 | 7 | 78 | 1 |
| Tee Higgins | 3 | 6 | 59 | 0 |
| Samaje Perine | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 |
| Chase Brown | 5 | 6 | 22 | 0 |
| Drew Sample | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 |
| Dohnte Meyers | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 |
| Ja'Marr Chase | 2 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 |
| Tanner Hudson | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Buccaneers.
Half-point at risk
2.54%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.5%
Expected total
43.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.54
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.76



