Closing spread
NYG -2.5
Total
37.5
Model margin
+4.1est.
NYG perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Titans
- QuestionableCordale FlottCBQuadricep· Limited
- QuestionableTyjae SpearsRBAnkle· Limited
- LimitedDaniel BellingerTEIllness
- LimitedTony PollardRBAnkle
Giants
- QuestionableBrian BurnsLBAnkle· DNP
- QuestionableDeonte BanksCBCalf· Limited
- QuestionableTyler NubinSCalf· Limited
- DNPJaxson DartQBKnee
- LimitedAndrew ThomasTGroin
Win probability
- Giants
- Titans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.083EPA / play+0.027
- 41.6%Success rate42.9%
- -0.067EPA / dropback+0.118
- -0.110EPA / rush-0.102
- 7.0%Explosive rate7.8%
- -0.46CPOE-2.00
- 35.8%Third-down rate44.9%
- 52.6%Red-zone TD rate62.4%
- 1.55Points / drive2.15
- 2.1%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
TEN lead 5–3 since 1999
NYG have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.4 points. NYG are 3-5 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TEN–NYG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 0 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 14:51 | 6 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 12:13 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 10:49 | 7 | 50 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| TEN | Q1 6:34 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–3 |
| NYG | Q1 4:11 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 0–3 |
| TEN | Q1 2:43 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–3 |
| NYG | Q1 1:10 | 4 | -5 | Punt | 0–3 |
| TEN | Q2 13:38 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–3 |
| NYG | Q2 11:59 | 11 | 39 | Field goal | 0–6 |
| TEN | Q2 4:49 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 0–6 |
| NYG | Q2 2:51 | 4 | 6 | Punt | 0–6 |
| TEN | Q2 1:24 | 5 | 22 | Missed field goal | 0–6 |
| NYG | Q2 0:41 | 6 | 30 | Field goal | 0–9 |
| NYG | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 79 | Field goal | 0–12 |
| TEN | Q3 6:56 | 12 | 68 | Turnover on downs | 0–12 |
| NYG | Q3 1:05 | 5 | 8 | Punt | 0–12 |
| TEN | Q4 12:43 | 14 | 76 | Touchdown | 7–12 |
| NYG | Q4 5:35 | 4 | 17 | Punt | 7–12 |
| TEN | Q4 3:03 | 13 | 64 | Turnover | 7–12 |
| NYG | Q4 0:17 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–12 |
Box score
Individual performances
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Ward | 23/36 | 181 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Pollard | 17 | 74 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Tyjae Spears | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 |
| Cam Ward | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carnell Tate | 6 | 9 | 58 | 0 |
| Wan'Dale Robinson | 7 | 11 | 57 | 1 |
| Tony Pollard | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
| Gunnar Helm | 2 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| Elic Ayomanor | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Chimere Dike | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Calvin Ridley | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jameis Winston | 14/22 | 118 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Skattebo | 20 | 60 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Najee Harris | 9 | 52 | 5.8 | 0 |
| Jameis Winston | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Skattebo | 3 | 4 | 40 | 0 |
| Malik Nabers | 5 | 6 | 26 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Malachi Fields | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 2 | 5 | 13 | 0 |
| Odell Beckham Jr. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Titans.
Half-point at risk
7.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.1%
Expected total
44.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.99
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+4.13



