1999 · Week 8

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Shane Matthews

22·48

Commanders

Washington

QB Brad Johnson

Jack Kent Cooke Stadium · outdoors · grass · 75°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

WAS -8.5

Total

44

Model margin

+5.8est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.102EPA / play+0.098
  • 38.6%Success rate44.4%
  • -0.043EPA / dropback+0.143
  • -0.228EPA / rush+0.036
  • 7.4%Explosive rate10.8%
  • 37.0%Third-down rate36.2%
  • 44.0%Red-zone TD rate68.3%
  • 1.03Points / drive1.78
  • 3.1%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.001

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. WAS are 10-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Cade McNown23/4027233
Shane Matthews13/2311301

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Curtis Enis19562.90
Cade McNown2105.00
Edgar Bennett263.00
Bobby Engram122.00
Shane Matthews100.00
Glyn Milburn100.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson15/2520420
Rodney Peete2/8801

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis1214311.92
Skip Hicks7223.10
Brad Johnson111.01
Brian Mitchell2-1-0.50
Rodney Peete2-1-0.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +8.56.2%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.1%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

1.31%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

64.5%

Expected total

44.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.29
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+5.85