1999 · Week 8 · Division

Final

Jaguars

Jacksonville

QB Mark Brunell

41·10

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Akili Smith

Cinergy Field · outdoors · astroturf · 69°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

JAX -12.5

Total

38

Model margin

-3.6est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Jaguars

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsJaguars wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Jaguarsedge mapBengals
  • +0.048EPA / play-0.068
  • 42.5%Success rate39.4%
  • +0.145EPA / dropback-0.034
  • -0.086EPA / rush-0.132
  • 8.0%Explosive rate7.1%
  • 40.4%Third-down rate39.2%
  • 46.2%Red-zone TD rate43.1%
  • 1.75Points / drive1.24
  • 1.5%Turnover rate2.4%
  • -0.127EPA / play allowed+0.041

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 9–9 since 1999

CIN have won 4 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. CIN are 7-8-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W2JAX @ CIN2731CIN
2023 · W13CIN @ JAX3431CIN
2021 · W4JAX @ CIN2124CIN
2020 · W4JAX @ CIN2533CIN
2019 · W7JAX @ CIN2717JAX
2017 · W9CIN @ JAX723JAX
2014 · W9JAX @ CIN2333CIN
2012 · W4CIN @ JAX2710CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Jaguars

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell11/1914520
Jay Fiedler6/96900

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Fred Taylor151288.51
James Stewart10323.22
Tavian Banks6122.00
Mark Brunell2115.50
Jay Fiedler100.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jimmy Smith811891
Tavian Banks24500
Kyle Brady23290
Keenan McCardell16231
Reggie Barlow11110
Damon Jones11110
Fred Taylor1130
James Stewart11-20

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake13/2315510
Akili Smith6/126702
Carl Pickens1/1600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Akili Smith34013.30
Corey Dillon14322.30
Michael Basnight4112.80
Jeff Blake2105.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -12.52.8%3.1%4.8%3.2%7.5%6.8%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Jaguars.

Half-point at risk

1.22%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

39.4%

Expected total

45.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.15
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.47
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin-3.62