1999 · Week 10 · Division

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Tony Banks

3·6

Jaguars

Jacksonville

QB Mark Brunell

Alltel Stadium · outdoors · grass · 77°F · wind 11mph

Closing spread

JAX -13

Total

37

Model margin

+3.4est.

JAX perspective

Push chance

1.7%est.

Win probability

  • Jaguars
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Jaguars winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapJaguars
  • -0.091EPA / play+0.048
  • 36.5%Success rate42.5%
  • -0.084EPA / dropback+0.145
  • -0.100EPA / rush-0.086
  • 7.5%Explosive rate8.0%
  • 28.4%Third-down rate40.4%
  • 40.6%Red-zone TD rate46.2%
  • 1.00Points / drive1.75
  • 2.7%Turnover rate1.5%
  • -0.151EPA / play allowed-0.127

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 11–7 since 1999

Meetings average 38.7 points. JAX are 7-7-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W15BAL @ JAX237BAL
2022 · W12BAL @ JAX2728JAX
2020 · W15JAX @ BAL1440BAL
2017 · W3BAL @ JAX744JAX
2016 · W3BAL @ JAX1917BAL
2015 · W10JAX @ BAL2220JAX
2014 · W15JAX @ BAL1220BAL
2011 · W7BAL @ JAX712JAX

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Stoney Case7/1210300
Tony Banks10/217300

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Errict Rhett19502.60
Tony Banks3227.30
Stoney Case2168.00

Jaguars

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell20/2911800

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Stewart18251.40
Fred Taylor7121.70
Mark Brunell11010.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Jimmy Smith79520
Keenan McCardell46180
Kyle Brady23170
Damon Jones2490
Reggie Barlow1270
James Stewart2360
Fred Taylor1130

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +137.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Jaguars; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

1.68%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.0%

Expected total

44.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.79
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.35