1999 · Week 10 · Division
FinalVeterans Stadium · outdoors · astroturf · 60°F · wind 0mph
Closing spread
WAS -6
Total
42
Model margin
-1.3est.
PHI perspective
Push chance
3.0%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Eagles
- Commanders
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.098EPA / play-0.192
- 44.4%Success rate33.4%
- +0.143EPA / dropback-0.199
- +0.036EPA / rush-0.181
- 10.8%Explosive rate6.4%
- 36.2%Third-down rate31.2%
- 68.3%Red-zone TD rate46.7%
- 1.78Points / drive0.90
- 2.2%Turnover rate3.6%
- -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.098
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PHI lead 35–22 since 1999
Meetings average 45.4 points. PHI are 27-27-3 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | WAS–PHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAS | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 89 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| PHI | Q1 13:28 | 10 | 52 | Field goal | 7–3 |
| WAS | Q1 9:11 | 7 | 80 | Touchdown | 14–9 |
| PHI | Q1 5:44 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 14–10 |
| WAS | Q1 5:29 | 4 | 21 | Turnover | 14–10 |
| PHI | Q1 3:13 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 14–10 |
| WAS | Q1 1:50 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–10 |
| WAS | Q1 0:41 | 6 | 29 | Touchdown | 21–10 |
| PHI | Q2 13:00 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 21–10 |
| WAS | Q2 11:16 | 7 | 13 | Missed field goal | 21–10 |
| PHI | Q2 7:49 | 10 | 36 | Turnover on downs | 21–10 |
| WAS | Q2 1:55 | 2 | 6 | Turnover | 21–10 |
| PHI | Q2 1:15 | 3 | 0 | Field goal | 21–13 |
| WAS | Q2 0:23 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 21–13 |
| PHI | Q3 15:00 | 5 | -5 | Missed field goal | 21–13 |
| WAS | Q3 11:36 | 4 | 11 | Turnover | 21–13 |
| PHI | Q3 9:56 | 3 | 5 | Field goal | 21–16 |
| WAS | Q3 8:42 | 4 | 26 | Turnover | 21–16 |
| PHI | Q3 6:55 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 21–16 |
| WAS | Q3 4:36 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 21–16 |
| PHI | Q3 3:11 | 6 | 60 | Touchdown | 21–24 |
| WAS | Q3 0:08 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 21–24 |
| PHI | Q3 0:00 | 6 | 17 | Field goal | 21–27 |
| WAS | Q4 11:33 | 2 | 91 | Touchdown | 28–27 |
| PHI | Q4 11:33 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 28–27 |
| WAS | Q4 9:06 | 7 | 26 | Turnover | 28–27 |
| PHI | Q4 5:49 | 8 | 45 | Touchdown | 28–35 |
| PHI | Q4 3:38 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 28–35 |
| WAS | Q4 3:38 | 11 | 29 | Turnover on downs | 28–35 |
| PHI | Q4 1:42 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 28–35 |
Box score
Individual performances
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Johnson | 18/33 | 313 | 2 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Davis | 25 | 122 | 4.9 | 2 |
| Michael Westbrook | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Brad Johnson | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Westbrook | 4 | 8 | 152 | 1 |
| Albert Connell | 6 | 12 | 88 | 1 |
| Mike Sellers | 1 | 2 | 32 | 0 |
| Stephen Alexander | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 |
| Brian Mitchell | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
| Stephen Davis | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Irving Fryar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Eagles
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donovan McNabb | 8/21 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duce Staley | 28 | 122 | 4.4 | 1 |
| Donovan McNabb | 9 | 49 | 5.4 | 0 |
| Eric Bieniemy | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torrance Small | 4 | 5 | 30 | 0 |
| Duce Staley | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Jed Weaver | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Luther Broughton | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Charles Johnson | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Ed Smith | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Van Dyke | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Eagles; negative favour Commanders.
Half-point at risk
3.03%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
45.6%
Expected total
43.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.17
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-1.68
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-1.30



