1999 · Week 14 · Division

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

3·28

Commanders

Washington

QB Brad Johnson

Jack Kent Cooke Stadium · outdoors · grass · 53°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

WAS -5.5

Total

46.5

Model margin

+6.7est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.176EPA / play+0.098
  • 35.9%Success rate44.4%
  • -0.148EPA / dropback+0.143
  • -0.226EPA / rush+0.036
  • 5.9%Explosive rate10.8%
  • 33.3%Third-down rate36.2%
  • 53.1%Red-zone TD rate68.3%
  • 0.87Points / drive1.78
  • 3.8%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.001EPA / play allowed-0.001

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer15/3214703

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Murrell8415.10
Michael Pittman382.70
Jake Plummer263.00
David Boston1-2-2.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson17/3119122

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis371895.11
Brian Mitchell3196.30
Skip Hicks2105.01
Brad Johnson2-2-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Albert Connell35540
Michael Westbrook48521
Irving Fryar35191
Stephen Alexander11140
Brian Mitchell23140

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.1%6.0%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

3.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

66.6%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+4.12
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.69