1999 · Week 16

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Cade McNown

12·34

Rams

St. Louis

QB Kurt Warner

TWA Dome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

STL -10

Total

46.5

Model margin

+4.9est.

STL perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 8–7 since 1999

Meetings average 40 points. STL are 6-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsLA @ CHI2017RAMS
2024 · W4LA @ CHI1824CHI
2021 · W1CHI @ LA1434RAMS
2020 · W7CHI @ LA1024RAMS
2019 · W11CHI @ LA717RAMS
2018 · W14LA @ CHI615CHI
2015 · W10CHI @ STL3713CHI
2013 · W12CHI @ STL2142RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shane Matthews23/3926621
Cade McNown9/1612501

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
James Allen6305.00
Curtis Enis7213.00
Cade McNown3186.00
Shane Matthews100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +106.4%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%3.0%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.25%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

62.2%

Expected total

43.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.57
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.80
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.94

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.