2000 · Week 3

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Tony Banks

6·19

Dolphins

Miami

QB Jay Fiedler

Pro Player Stadium · outdoors · grass · 80°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

BAL -1.5

Total

34.5

Model margin

+0.4est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapDolphins
  • -0.056EPA / play-0.033
  • 40.2%Success rate38.4%
  • -0.061EPA / dropback+0.081
  • -0.052EPA / rush-0.150
  • 8.4%Explosive rate7.5%
  • 40.7%Third-down rate34.3%
  • 36.0%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
  • 1.45Points / drive1.52
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.6%
  • -0.217EPA / play allowed-0.111

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–7 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.6 points. MIA are 6-13 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W9BAL @ MIA286BAL
2023 · W17MIA @ BAL1956BAL
2022 · W2MIA @ BAL4238MIA
2021 · W10BAL @ MIA1022MIA
2019 · W1BAL @ MIA5910BAL
2017 · W8MIA @ BAL040BAL
2016 · W13MIA @ BAL638BAL
2015 · W13BAL @ MIA1315MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tony Banks19/3118901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Lewis9768.40
Priest Holmes6254.20
Tony Banks2115.50
Obafemi Ayanbadejo166.00

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Fiedler11/1616011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Smith22632.91
Thurman Thomas3258.30
J.J. Johnson5102.00
Jay Fiedler482.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -1.52.7%4.4%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.7%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

50.1%

Expected total

41.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.42
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.23
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.37