2000 · Week 3 · Division

Final

Cowboys

Dallas

QB Randall Cunningham

27·21

Commanders

Washington

QB Brad Johnson

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 66°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

WAS -10.5

Total

44

Model margin

+3.5est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cowboys

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCowboys wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cowboysedge mapCommanders
  • -0.074EPA / play-0.027
  • 41.5%Success rate41.1%
  • -0.085EPA / dropback+0.058
  • -0.061EPA / rush-0.148
  • 8.6%Explosive rate8.1%
  • 36.8%Third-down rate39.0%
  • 46.9%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
  • 1.35Points / drive1.30
  • 3.7%Turnover rate2.9%
  • +0.022EPA / play allowed-0.093

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

DAL lead 38–16 since 1999

DAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 44.3 points. WAS are 23-31 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17DAL @ WAS3023DAL
2025 · W7WAS @ DAL2244DAL
2024 · W18WAS @ DAL2319WAS
2024 · W12DAL @ WAS3426DAL
2023 · W18DAL @ WAS3810DAL
2023 · W12WAS @ DAL1045DAL
2022 · W18DAL @ WAS626WAS
2022 · W4WAS @ DAL1025DAL

Box score

Individual performances

Cowboys

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Randall Cunningham10/2318521

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Emmitt Smith24833.51
Randall Cunningham33210.70
Raghib Ismail23015.00
Chris Warren284.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Chris Warren34861
Raghib Ismail35650
Jackie Harris23281
James McKnight1460
David LaFleur0300
Emmitt Smith1200

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson30/4824111

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis25913.62
Adrian Murrell133.00
Brad Johnson221.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +10.56.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cowboys.

Half-point at risk

1.48%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.4%

Expected total

42.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.76
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-1.86
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.47