Closing spread
GB -5.5
Total
41
Model margin
+4.7est.
GB perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Packers
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.144EPA / play-0.010
- 38.4%Success rate40.2%
- -0.138EPA / dropback+0.029
- -0.156EPA / rush-0.076
- 6.1%Explosive rate7.6%
- 29.8%Third-down rate38.8%
- 35.6%Red-zone TD rate53.5%
- 0.80Points / drive1.67
- 2.7%Turnover rate2.9%
- -0.018EPA / play allowed-0.033
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
GB lead 41–16 since 1999
Meetings average 42.7 points. GB are 38-18-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 14:40 | 5 | 17 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| GB | Q1 12:18 | 5 | 0 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q1 9:58 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–0 |
| GB | Q1 8:22 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q1 7:22 | 4 | 54 | Field goal | 10–0 |
| GB | Q1 4:38 | 3 | 22 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q1 3:02 | 4 | 6 | Punt | 10–0 |
| GB | Q1 1:00 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q2 14:53 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 10–0 |
| GB | Q2 13:51 | 6 | 6 | Punt | 10–0 |
| CHI | Q2 10:34 | 3 | 80 | Touchdown | 17–0 |
| GB | Q2 9:07 | 7 | 34 | Field goal | 17–3 |
| CHI | Q2 4:48 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 17–3 |
| GB | Q2 2:28 | 3 | 16 | Turnover | 17–3 |
| CHI | Q2 1:31 | 6 | 27 | Missed field goal | 17–3 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 17–3 |
| GB | Q3 13:31 | 4 | 15 | Punt | 17–3 |
| CHI | Q3 10:54 | 9 | 99 | Touchdown | 24–3 |
| GB | Q3 5:35 | 6 | 71 | Touchdown | 24–10 |
| CHI | Q3 2:36 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 24–10 |
| GB | Q3 0:18 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 24–10 |
| CHI | Q4 14:04 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 24–10 |
| GB | Q4 12:39 | 9 | 82 | Touchdown | 24–17 |
| CHI | Q4 8:44 | 10 | 61 | Field goal | 27–17 |
| GB | Q4 3:15 | 7 | 68 | Touchdown | 27–24 |
| CHI | Q4 1:58 | 4 | 7 | Punt | 27–24 |
| GB | Q4 1:19 | 8 | 33 | Turnover on downs | 27–24 |
| CHI | Q4 0:07 | 1 | -1 | End of half | 27–24 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cade McNown | 11/20 | 203 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Allen | 24 | 72 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Eddie Kennison | 1 | 52 | 52.0 | 0 |
| Cade McNown | 10 | 51 | 5.1 | 1 |
| Curtis Enis | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Robinson | 2 | 3 | 126 | 2 |
| John Allred | 4 | 6 | 28 | 0 |
| Eddie Kennison | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 |
| Marty Booker | 2 | 4 | 15 | 0 |
| Alonzo Mayes | 1 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Curtis Enis | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| James Allen | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Packers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Favre | 31/48 | 333 | 3 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsey Levens | 11 | 24 | 2.2 | 0 |
| Ahman Green | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Schroeder | 8 | 10 | 108 | 2 |
| Bubba Franks | 5 | 8 | 54 | 0 |
| Donald Driver | 3 | 5 | 43 | 0 |
| Ahman Green | 5 | 8 | 41 | 0 |
| Dorsey Levens | 5 | 7 | 41 | 0 |
| Antonio Freeman | 3 | 5 | 32 | 1 |
| Charles Lee | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Packers; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
3.19%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
61.6%
Expected total
44.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.15
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+4.72



