Closing spread
JAX -2.5
Total
37.5
Model margin
+1.9est.
JAX perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Jaguars
- Ravens
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.056EPA / play+0.010
- 40.2%Success rate41.4%
- -0.061EPA / dropback+0.066
- -0.052EPA / rush-0.071
- 8.4%Explosive rate8.0%
- 40.7%Third-down rate42.8%
- 36.0%Red-zone TD rate55.4%
- 1.45Points / drive1.87
- 2.3%Turnover rate2.4%
- -0.217EPA / play allowed-0.022
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BAL lead 11–7 since 1999
Meetings average 38.7 points. JAX are 7-7-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BAL–JAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 23 | Punt | 0–0 |
| JAX | Q1 12:44 | 7 | 36 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BAL | Q1 9:41 | 2 | 7 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| JAX | Q1 9:00 | 3 | 2 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| BAL | Q1 8:04 | 4 | 13 | Punt | 0–3 |
| JAX | Q1 6:28 | 4 | 20 | Punt | 0–3 |
| BAL | Q1 3:47 | 6 | 34 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| JAX | Q1 1:23 | 0 | 0 | Punt | 3–3 |
| BAL | Q1 1:00 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 3–3 |
| JAX | Q1 0:13 | 16 | 67 | Missed field goal | 3–3 |
| BAL | Q2 7:29 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 3–3 |
| JAX | Q2 6:06 | 4 | 17 | Punt | 3–3 |
| BAL | Q2 4:17 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 3–3 |
| JAX | Q2 2:46 | 5 | 38 | Turnover | 3–3 |
| BAL | Q2 1:49 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 3–3 |
| JAX | Q2 1:16 | 1 | 9 | Turnover | 3–3 |
| BAL | Q2 1:02 | 4 | 19 | Field goal | 6–3 |
| JAX | Q2 0:21 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 6–3 |
| JAX | Q3 15:00 | 2 | 2 | Turnover | 6–3 |
| BAL | Q3 14:12 | 3 | -1 | Field goal | 9–3 |
| JAX | Q3 12:37 | 5 | 23 | Punt | 9–3 |
| BAL | Q3 9:38 | 8 | 27 | Punt | 9–3 |
| JAX | Q3 7:05 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 9–3 |
| BAL | Q3 6:02 | 15 | 65 | Field goal | 12–3 |
| JAX | Q4 13:38 | 2 | 6 | Turnover | 12–3 |
| BAL | Q4 12:48 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 12–3 |
| JAX | Q4 11:47 | 2 | 15 | Turnover | 12–3 |
| BAL | Q4 10:55 | 4 | 1 | Field goal | 15–3 |
| JAX | Q4 9:44 | 12 | 79 | Touchdown | 15–10 |
| BAL | Q4 4:04 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 15–10 |
| JAX | Q4 2:44 | 8 | 36 | Turnover | 15–10 |
| BAL | Q4 0:53 | 2 | -2 | End of half | 15–10 |
Box score
Individual performances
Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Banks | 17/39 | 154 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamal Lewis | 17 | 44 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Obafemi Ayanbadejo | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Tony Banks | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jermaine Lewis | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Priest Holmes | 2 | -6 | -3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qadry Ismail | 9 | 14 | 85 | 0 |
| Shannon Sharpe | 1 | 4 | 26 | 0 |
| Jermaine Lewis | 2 | 6 | 19 | 0 |
| Obafemi Ayanbadejo | 4 | 6 | 17 | 0 |
| Travis Taylor | 1 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Ben Coates | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Priest Holmes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jamal Lewis | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguars
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Brunell | 18/28 | 167 | 0 | 2 |
| Jamie Martin | 11/15 | 93 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Taylor | 17 | 54 | 3.2 | 1 |
| Mark Brunell | 8 | 32 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Anthony Johnson | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Jamie Martin | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Smith | 8 | 10 | 95 | 0 |
| Keenan McCardell | 8 | 11 | 63 | 0 |
| Kyle Brady | 5 | 6 | 45 | 0 |
| Fred Taylor | 7 | 9 | 45 | 0 |
| Alvis Whitted | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| R.Jay Soward | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Jaguars; negative favour Ravens.
Half-point at risk
7.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.3%
Expected total
41.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.85
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+0.23
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.94



