2000 · Week 10 · Division

Final / OT

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

20·26

Packers

Green Bay

QB Brett Favre

Lambeau Field · outdoors · grass · 50°F · wind 19mph

Closing spread

MIN -3.5

Total

47.5

Model margin

+2.9est.

GB perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Packers
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Packers winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapPackers
  • +0.102EPA / play-0.010
  • 44.7%Success rate40.2%
  • +0.184EPA / dropback+0.029
  • -0.026EPA / rush-0.076
  • 10.6%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 46.0%Third-down rate38.8%
  • 67.4%Red-zone TD rate53.5%
  • 2.14Points / drive1.67
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.9%
  • +0.083EPA / play allowed-0.033

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

GB lead 31–24–2 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 46.8 points. GB are 28-29 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1GB @ MIN2239MIN
2025 · W18GB @ MIN316MIN
2025 · W12MIN @ GB623GB
2024 · W17GB @ MIN2527MIN
2024 · W4MIN @ GB3129MIN
2023 · W17GB @ MIN3310GB
2023 · W8MIN @ GB2410MIN
2022 · W17MIN @ GB1741GB

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper17/3427623

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Robert Smith241225.10
Daunte Culpepper4205.00
Jimmy Kleinsasser294.50
Moe Williams294.50
Randy Moss1-3-3.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Randy Moss6121300
Robert Smith22671
Cris Carter510591
Chris Walsh23110
Matt Hatchette1450
Andrew Jordan1240
John Davis0100

Packers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre17/3623520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ahman Green23683.01
Bill Schroeder11212.00
Brett Favre122.00
De'Mond Parker1-1-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.53.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%

Positive margins favour Packers; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

6.90%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.8%

Expected total

47.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.33
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.90