2000 · Week 10 · Division

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Jeff George

15·16

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

Sun Devil Stadium · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 8mph

Closing spread

WAS -10

Total

40

Model margin

-3.8est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

3.1%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapCardinals
  • -0.027EPA / play-0.126
  • 41.1%Success rate39.0%
  • +0.058EPA / dropback-0.066
  • -0.148EPA / rush-0.243
  • 8.1%Explosive rate7.4%
  • 39.0%Third-down rate36.7%
  • 57.1%Red-zone TD rate39.7%
  • 1.30Points / drive1.04
  • 2.9%Turnover rate4.0%
  • -0.093EPA / play allowed+0.104

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. ARI are 8-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff George20/3927602

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis301244.11
Skip Hicks6254.20
James Thrash11515.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
James Thrash681020
Stephen Davis23620
Stephen Alexander57530
Irving Fryar23150
Albert Connell110110

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer12/1914601

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Pittman15302.01
Thomas Jones4164.00
Jake Plummer400.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -102.8%3.1%4.9%3.2%7.5%6.7%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

3.15%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

38.9%

Expected total

42.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.39
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.06
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin-3.81