2002 · Week 1

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Jake Plummer

23·31

Commanders

Washington

QB Shane Matthews

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 76°F · wind 5mph

Closing spread

WAS -6

Total

44.5

Model margin

+6.3est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.092EPA / play-0.056
  • 38.4%Success rate41.7%
  • -0.052EPA / dropback-0.037
  • -0.160EPA / rush-0.083
  • 7.2%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 43.6%Third-down rate39.7%
  • 55.4%Red-zone TD rate57.0%
  • 1.06Points / drive1.22
  • 3.4%Turnover rate3.3%
  • +0.083EPA / play allowed-0.082

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 14–4 since 1999

WAS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 38.9 points. WAS are 10-8 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W4WAS @ ARI4214WAS
2023 · W1ARI @ WAS1620WAS
2020 · W2WAS @ ARI1530ARI
2018 · W1WAS @ ARI246WAS
2017 · W15ARI @ WAS1520WAS
2016 · W13WAS @ ARI2331ARI
2014 · W6WAS @ ARI2030ARI
2011 · W2ARI @ WAS2122WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jake Plummer14/3618711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones17543.20
Jake Plummer2115.51
Frank Sanders155.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
David Boston7151381
MarTay Jenkins14180
Freddie Jones15100
Thomas Jones3570
Frank Sanders0100
Bryan Gilmore0200

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shane Matthews28/4032731

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Stephen Davis261044.01
Derrius Thompson11313.00
Kenny Watson155.00
Shane Matthews400.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.2%6.1%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.2%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

3.20%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.7%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.76
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.32