2002 · Week 8 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Chris Chandler

7·25

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Daunte Culpepper

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

MIN -2

Total

46

Model margin

+6.2est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.129EPA / play+0.060
  • 40.0%Success rate45.1%
  • -0.089EPA / dropback+0.054
  • -0.197EPA / rush+0.071
  • 7.5%Explosive rate9.3%
  • 33.7%Third-down rate43.6%
  • 64.5%Red-zone TD rate58.3%
  • 1.35Points / drive1.93
  • 3.2%Turnover rate3.4%
  • -0.001EPA / play allowed+0.082

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chris Chandler15/2517611
Henry Burris1/62801

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Henry Burris2199.50
Anthony Thomas9182.00
Chris Chandler177.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Marty Booker49801
Dez White45650
Marcus Robinson14220
Ahmad Merritt25110
Stanley Pritchett1190
Anthony Thomas1330

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Daunte Culpepper22/2921610
Randy Moss0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Bennett291063.70
Daunte Culpepper8313.90
Moe Williams691.51
Randy Moss122.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +23.3%6.1%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.2%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.05%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.3%

Expected total

45.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.96
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.64
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.16