2002 · Week 11

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Jeff Blake

7·26

Dolphins

Miami

QB Ray Lucas

Pro Player Stadium · outdoors · grass · 68°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

MIA -5

Total

34.5

Model margin

+0.8est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

1.9%est.

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapDolphins
  • -0.058EPA / play+0.017
  • 41.6%Success rate45.0%
  • -0.044EPA / dropback+0.060
  • -0.078EPA / rush-0.028
  • 8.3%Explosive rate11.0%
  • 38.2%Third-down rate37.0%
  • 57.3%Red-zone TD rate65.1%
  • 1.09Points / drive1.85
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.9%
  • -0.021EPA / play allowed-0.083

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–7 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.6 points. MIA are 6-13 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W9BAL @ MIA286BAL
2023 · W17MIA @ BAL1956BAL
2022 · W2MIA @ BAL4238MIA
2021 · W10BAL @ MIA1022MIA
2019 · W1BAL @ MIA5910BAL
2017 · W8MIA @ BAL040BAL
2016 · W13MIA @ BAL638BAL
2015 · W13BAL @ MIA1315MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake14/2812711

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Lewis17472.80
Jeff Blake284.00
Alan Ricard284.00
Chester Taylor133.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Travis Taylor410481
Jamal Lewis11260
Terry Jones23220
Javin Hunter22150
Todd Heap1360
Ron Johnson1450
Chester Taylor3450

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ray Lucas18/2622100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ricky Williams261023.92
Ray Lucas11121.11
James McKnight122.00
Chris Chambers100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +54.3%2.8%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

1.89%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.2%

Expected total

44.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.51
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-3.27
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.81