2002 · Week 13 · Division

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Jeff Blake

27·23

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jon Kitna

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · grass · 29°F · wind 13mph

Closing spread

BAL -2.5

Total

37.5

Model margin

+1.8est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapBengals
  • -0.058EPA / play-0.063
  • 41.6%Success rate43.4%
  • -0.044EPA / dropback-0.085
  • -0.078EPA / rush-0.027
  • 8.3%Explosive rate6.3%
  • 38.2%Third-down rate39.3%
  • 57.3%Red-zone TD rate50.2%
  • 1.09Points / drive1.04
  • 2.9%Turnover rate2.9%
  • -0.021EPA / play allowed+0.080

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. CIN are 28-25-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Blake10/1911520

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Lewis221215.50
Jeff Blake5193.80
Chester Taylor294.50
Alan Ricard144.00
Travis Taylor1-5-5.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Travis Taylor38591
Todd Heap35301
Chester Taylor11160
Jamal Lewis1140
Alan Ricard1130
John Jones1130
Terry Jones0100
Javin Hunter0100

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna30/4630821

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Corey Dillon23703.01
Rudi Johnson4102.50
Jon Kitna199.00
Peter Warrick1-11-11.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.54.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.06%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.0%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.74
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.82