Closing spread
PIT -14
Total
37.5
Model margin
+6.4est.
PIT perspective
Push chance
3.2%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Steelers
- Texans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.226EPA / play+0.008
- 33.0%Success rate43.3%
- -0.172EPA / dropback+0.070
- -0.307EPA / rush-0.073
- 5.8%Explosive rate9.7%
- 25.7%Third-down rate42.2%
- 39.5%Red-zone TD rate51.8%
- 0.66Points / drive1.71
- 2.4%Turnover rate2.9%
- -0.083EPA / play allowed-0.086
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 5–4 since 1999
HOU have won 2 straight. Meetings average 40 points. PIT are 5-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | HOU–PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 10:51 | 11 | 48 | Opp touchdown | 7–0 |
| HOU | Q1 5:54 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 7–0 |
| PIT | Q1 5:54 | 8 | 31 | Opp touchdown | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q1 2:01 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q1 2:01 | 8 | 52 | Turnover | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q2 13:18 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q2 11:53 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q2 10:18 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q2 8:17 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q2 6:47 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q2 5:49 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q2 4:28 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 14–0 |
| PIT | Q2 2:53 | 9 | 62 | Field goal | 14–3 |
| HOU | Q2 0:20 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 14–3 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 33 | Field goal | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q3 9:33 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q3 8:21 | 4 | 12 | Punt | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q3 7:02 | 5 | 19 | Punt | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q3 4:27 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q3 2:42 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q3 0:51 | 10 | 39 | Missed field goal | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q4 13:00 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q4 10:52 | 4 | 14 | Punt | 14–6 |
| PIT | Q4 8:29 | 6 | 19 | Turnover on downs | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q4 5:40 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 14–6 |
| HOU | Q4 3:57 | 3 | -5 | Field goal | 17–6 |
| PIT | Q4 3:35 | 8 | 34 | Opp touchdown | 24–6 |
| HOU | Q4 2:02 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 24–6 |
| PIT | Q4 2:02 | 8 | 60 | End of half | 24–6 |
Box score
Individual performances
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Carr | 3/10 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Allen | 13 | 19 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Jonathan Wells | 10 | 12 | 1.2 | 0 |
| David Carr | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billy Miller | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 |
| James Allen | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Corey Bradford | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Jabar Gaffney | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarrod Baxter | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Maddox | 30/57 | 325 | 0 | 2 |
| Antwaan Randle El | 1/1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Zereoue | 11 | 69 | 6.3 | 0 |
| Jerome Bettis | 14 | 30 | 2.1 | 0 |
| Antwaan Randle El | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Hines Ward | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Tommy Maddox | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antwaan Randle El | 8 | 11 | 88 | 0 |
| Plaxico Burress | 6 | 18 | 83 | 0 |
| Hines Ward | 9 | 13 | 76 | 0 |
| Terance Mathis | 5 | 9 | 42 | 0 |
| Amos Zereoue | 2 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Jerome Bettis | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerame Tuman | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Texans.
Half-point at risk
3.18%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
65.8%
Expected total
40.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.79
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+6.36



