2002 · Week 14 · Division
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 47°F · wind 0mph
Closing spread
WAS -3
Total
37.5
Model margin
+2.4est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Commanders
- Giants
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.008EPA / play-0.056
- 41.7%Success rate41.7%
- +0.151EPA / dropback-0.037
- -0.177EPA / rush-0.083
- 9.6%Explosive rate8.5%
- 38.8%Third-down rate39.7%
- 44.5%Red-zone TD rate57.0%
- 1.46Points / drive1.22
- 2.3%Turnover rate3.3%
- -0.060EPA / play allowed-0.082
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NYG lead 32–21–2 since 1999
Meetings average 40.1 points. WAS are 24-29-2 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NYG–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYG | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 13:40 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 12:45 | 8 | 20 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 9:08 | 7 | 42 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| NYG | Q1 6:03 | 9 | 43 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| WAS | Q1 2:10 | 7 | 54 | Turnover | 3–0 |
| NYG | Q2 13:57 | 11 | 60 | Touchdown | 10–0 |
| WAS | Q2 8:47 | 5 | 7 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| NYG | Q2 5:59 | 5 | 22 | Missed field goal | 10–0 |
| WAS | Q2 3:52 | 3 | 13 | Turnover | 10–0 |
| NYG | Q2 2:27 | 2 | 29 | Touchdown | 17–0 |
| WAS | Q2 1:53 | 6 | 54 | Field goal | 17–3 |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 34 | Punt | 17–3 |
| NYG | Q3 11:26 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 17–3 |
| WAS | Q3 9:21 | 6 | 23 | Field goal | 17–6 |
| NYG | Q3 5:52 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 17–6 |
| WAS | Q3 4:30 | 5 | 55 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| NYG | Q3 3:17 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 17–14 |
| NYG | Q3 2:09 | 2 | 21 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| WAS | Q3 1:25 | 4 | 20 | Punt | 24–14 |
| NYG | Q3 0:04 | 9 | 89 | Field goal | 27–14 |
| WAS | Q4 10:57 | 7 | 59 | Touchdown | 27–21 |
| NYG | Q4 8:42 | 5 | 4 | Punt | 27–21 |
| WAS | Q4 6:54 | 8 | 55 | Turnover | 27–21 |
| NYG | Q4 3:59 | 6 | 13 | Punt | 27–21 |
| WAS | Q4 0:55 | 7 | 29 | End of half | 27–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Giants
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Collins | 17/31 | 212 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiki Barber | 20 | 96 | 4.8 | 1 |
| Ron Dayne | 8 | 11 | 1.4 | 0 |
| Daryl Jones | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Shockey | 5 | 9 | 89 | 0 |
| Amani Toomer | 4 | 7 | 60 | 1 |
| Daryl Jones | 3 | 7 | 41 | 0 |
| Tiki Barber | 2 | 4 | 13 | 0 |
| Charles Stackhouse | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Ron Dayne | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Dan Campbell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ramsey | 12/27 | 204 | 1 | 0 |
| Danny Wuerffel | 13/19 | 159 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Davis | 12 | 70 | 5.8 | 1 |
| Danny Wuerffel | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 0 |
| Kenny Watson | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Darnerien McCants | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Derrius Thompson | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Rock Cartwright | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Ladell Betts | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrius Thompson | 6 | 10 | 122 | 0 |
| Rod Gardner | 5 | 12 | 76 | 1 |
| Ladell Betts | 4 | 4 | 53 | 0 |
| Darnerien McCants | 3 | 5 | 41 | 0 |
| Walter Rasby | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| Kenny Watson | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Zeron Flemister | 1 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Chris Doering | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Stephen Davis | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Giants.
Half-point at risk
7.51%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
55.6%
Expected total
41.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.09
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-0.30
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin+2.41



