Closing spread
SF -4.5
Total
40
Model margin
-0.7est.
DAL perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Cowboys
- 49ers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.098EPA / play-0.190
- 45.2%Success rate37.2%
- +0.159EPA / dropback-0.193
- +0.004EPA / rush-0.185
- 7.5%Explosive rate9.2%
- 52.5%Third-down rate23.8%
- 55.8%Red-zone TD rate57.0%
- 1.83Points / drive0.79
- 1.5%Turnover rate3.3%
- +0.046EPA / play allowed-0.059
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 7–7 since 1999
SF have won 4 straight. Meetings average 52.2 points. DAL are 6-7-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SF–DAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SF | Q1 14:24 | 5 | 8 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| DAL | Q1 12:15 | 9 | 61 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| SF | Q1 6:57 | 0 | 0 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| DAL | Q1 6:51 | 6 | 12 | Field goal | 0–6 |
| SF | Q1 4:38 | 9 | 24 | Punt | 0–6 |
| DAL | Q2 14:46 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–6 |
| SF | Q2 14:38 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–6 |
| DAL | Q2 13:42 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–6 |
| SF | Q2 12:08 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 0–6 |
| DAL | Q2 9:49 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–6 |
| SF | Q2 9:24 | 6 | 58 | Touchdown | 7–6 |
| DAL | Q2 6:05 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–6 |
| SF | Q2 3:53 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–6 |
| DAL | Q2 2:22 | 6 | 28 | Punt | 7–6 |
| SF | Q2 1:32 | 9 | 62 | Missed field goal | 7–6 |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 7–6 |
| DAL | Q3 12:35 | 3 | 8 | Turnover | 7–6 |
| SF | Q3 11:08 | 3 | 3 | Field goal | 10–6 |
| DAL | Q3 9:52 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 10–6 |
| SF | Q3 7:08 | 8 | 26 | Punt | 10–6 |
| DAL | Q3 2:20 | 2 | 13 | Touchdown | 10–13 |
| SF | Q3 1:39 | 12 | 58 | Touchdown | 17–19 |
| DAL | Q4 10:54 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 17–20 |
| SF | Q4 10:34 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 17–20 |
| DAL | Q4 9:07 | 5 | 71 | Touchdown | 17–27 |
| SF | Q4 6:56 | 4 | 50 | Touchdown | 24–27 |
| DAL | Q4 5:26 | 6 | 36 | Missed field goal | 24–27 |
| SF | Q4 2:16 | 13 | 63 | Touchdown | 31–27 |
| DAL | Q4 0:12 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 31–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
49ers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Garcia | 36/55 | 276 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Garcia | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 1 |
| Paul Smith | 13 | 40 | 3.1 | 0 |
| Garrison Hearst | 9 | 35 | 3.9 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terrell Owens | 12 | 16 | 123 | 2 |
| Eric Johnson | 8 | 11 | 60 | 0 |
| Tai Streets | 6 | 8 | 36 | 1 |
| Paul Smith | 2 | 4 | 17 | 0 |
| Justin Swift | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| J.J. Stokes | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Garrison Hearst | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
Cowboys
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Hutchinson | 11/28 | 147 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmitt Smith | 19 | 66 | 3.5 | 2 |
| Chad Hutchinson | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 |
| Troy Hambrick | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 |
| Michael Wiley | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony McGee | 3 | 4 | 73 | 0 |
| Michael Wiley | 1 | 1 | 31 | 0 |
| Troy Hambrick | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Antonio Bryant | 1 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Joey Galloway | 1 | 8 | 7 | 0 |
| James Whalen | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Ken-Yon Rambo | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Mike Lucky | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Darnay Scott | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmitt Smith | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Cowboys; negative favour 49ers.
Half-point at risk
2.48%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
47.1%
Expected total
43.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.54
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin-0.74



