2002 · Week 17 · Division
FinalFedExField · outdoors · grass · 46°F · wind 13mph
Closing spread
WAS -7.5
Total
36.5
Model margin
+6.3est.
WAS perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Commanders
- Cowboys
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.190EPA / play-0.056
- 37.2%Success rate41.7%
- -0.193EPA / dropback-0.037
- -0.185EPA / rush-0.083
- 9.2%Explosive rate8.5%
- 23.8%Third-down rate39.7%
- 57.0%Red-zone TD rate57.0%
- 0.79Points / drive1.22
- 3.3%Turnover rate3.3%
- -0.059EPA / play allowed-0.082
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
DAL lead 39–16 since 1999
DAL have won 3 straight. Meetings average 44.6 points. WAS are 23-32 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | DAL–WAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 13:06 | 8 | 41 | Punt | 0–0 |
| DAL | Q1 9:48 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 8:16 | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| DAL | Q1 8:09 | 4 | 33 | Punt | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q1 6:26 | 11 | 46 | Punt | 0–0 |
| DAL | Q2 14:51 | 3 | -1 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| WAS | Q2 13:53 | 4 | 24 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| DAL | Q2 12:19 | 4 | 12 | Punt | 0–7 |
| WAS | Q2 9:27 | 5 | 39 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| DAL | Q2 8:07 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 0–7 |
| WAS | Q2 6:01 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–7 |
| DAL | Q2 5:06 | 4 | 12 | Turnover | 0–7 |
| WAS | Q2 2:54 | 5 | 10 | Opp touchdown | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q2 0:42 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q2 0:42 | 1 | 3 | End of half | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 44 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q3 12:29 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 7–7 |
| WAS | Q3 10:52 | 4 | 45 | Turnover | 7–7 |
| DAL | Q3 9:19 | 5 | 4 | Opp touchdown | 7–14 |
| WAS | Q3 7:41 | 0 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 7–14 |
| DAL | Q3 7:41 | 6 | 0 | Punt | 7–14 |
| WAS | Q3 4:35 | 10 | 31 | Field goal | 7–17 |
| DAL | Q3 0:24 | 5 | 72 | Turnover | 7–17 |
| WAS | Q4 13:41 | 7 | 55 | Field goal | 7–20 |
| DAL | Q4 8:31 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 7–20 |
| WAS | Q4 7:06 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 7–20 |
| DAL | Q4 4:57 | 5 | 47 | Touchdown | 14–20 |
| WAS | Q4 3:10 | 3 | 11 | End of half | 14–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Cowboys
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Hutchinson | 12/23 | 189 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnay Scott | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 |
| Emmitt Smith | 18 | 13 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Troy Hambrick | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Chad Hutchinson | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Bryant | 7 | 9 | 170 | 1 |
| James Whalen | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Troy Hambrick | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Jason McKie | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Joey Galloway | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony McGee | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Wiley | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken-Yon Rambo | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmitt Smith | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
Commanders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ramsey | 17/31 | 209 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ladell Betts | 17 | 98 | 5.8 | 0 |
| Kenny Watson | 17 | 58 | 3.4 | 1 |
| Patrick Ramsey | 3 | -5 | -1.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrius Thompson | 4 | 9 | 78 | 0 |
| Darnerien McCants | 6 | 8 | 60 | 0 |
| Rod Gardner | 5 | 9 | 59 | 0 |
| Walter Rasby | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Kenny Watson | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Zeron Flemister | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Cowboys.
Half-point at risk
2.23%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
65.7%
Expected total
40.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.69
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+0.16
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+6.33



